Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OSLC Link Discovery Management - optional restriction for predicates #598

Open
MartinUlrich opened this issue Sep 5, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@MartinUlrich
Copy link

For the Link Discovery Service restriction based on the Link Predicates is considered.
Here the question shall be discussed, if the Link Predicate/s are mandatory or optional.

In todays IBM LDX implementation the link predicate is mandatory, as the client in any case is explicitly interested in defined link predicate/s.

Still the use case is likely, that a client is interested in any links pointing to the objects e.g. visualized on the screen.

Therefore the predicate shall be optional.

In case of overload a server can respond with e.g. bad request

@DavidJohnHoney
Copy link

This has potential performance and implementation consequences for implementations. Finding all links of any type could be very inefficient and lead to scalability and performance issues. I recommend that the first version of the LDM specification specifies the link types are mandatory. This matches the current implementation in IBM Rational ELM.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants