Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A possible inconsistent comment for Figure 12.5 #72

Open
mcavs opened this issue May 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

A possible inconsistent comment for Figure 12.5 #72

mcavs opened this issue May 1, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@mcavs
Copy link

mcavs commented May 1, 2023

There is a comment about Figure 12.5 as "There are more negative than positive residuals, which may be seen as a signal of a (local) positive bias of the predictions."

Do you think there is an inconsistency in this comment? Because it has been stated that the negatives are more than the positives, it means the model has a negative bias.

I think that this comment is not valid because the model has a positive bias, so the comment may be "the model has a positive bias because the positives are more in size despite the negatives more in quantity".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant