You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Clause 6.12.3.6.1 specified the command (12,1) to enable a set of parameter monitoring definitions. According to this clause, if an instruction to enable a PMON is accepted for execution, then the following should be done:
The PMON status should be set to 'Enabled' and
The repetition counter for the PMON should be reset to zero
The above makes sense in the case of a command which is used to enable a PMON which was disabled. However, clause 6.12.3.6.1 implies that a user can also enable a PMON which is already enabled. In that case, the only effect of the command is to reset the repetition counter of the PMON. Is this really the intention? I would normally expect that: either we reject a command to enable a PMON which is already enabled or we accept the command but then do nothing so as not to disrupt the operation of a running PMON.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Clause 6.12.3.6.1 specified the command (12,1) to enable a set of parameter monitoring definitions. According to this clause, if an instruction to enable a PMON is accepted for execution, then the following should be done:
The above makes sense in the case of a command which is used to enable a PMON which was disabled. However, clause 6.12.3.6.1 implies that a user can also enable a PMON which is already enabled. In that case, the only effect of the command is to reset the repetition counter of the PMON. Is this really the intention? I would normally expect that: either we reject a command to enable a PMON which is already enabled or we accept the command but then do nothing so as not to disrupt the operation of a running PMON.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: