Replies: 6 comments
-
Can you please provide
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm working whit an advanced content type, related to another act. Pod template is like this: {@name} [if related]
[/if]
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It might help if you did a Pods Component: Migrate Packages, Enable and then Pods Migrate, Export (copy that JSON) to a text file and upload so we can reproduce your issue. #3018 was specific to Taxonomy, nothing in your configuration above is specific to Taxonomy. Can you also provide what didn't work? What result did you get? Within an |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Ok, I tried {@related.name} and {@name} before patching. Now it works well at any of both modes. Yes, I'm sure, it not works for me ultil patching with first message's code: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm not doubting you, but we'd be getting reports constantly of issues if this was not working as intended without your code change. That's why having your setup export (which includes your Pods config and your templates and pages), would help for determining if it was something specific with your use case. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
20160708_sandbox_577fd1927c94c8357160708161514_archive.zip Files were sent to my personal email, so were missed. In the future, please upload them directly to the GitHub ticket so all communication on the issue can stay with the issue. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Using pods templates I get correct relationship list using {@related_field}, but does not work [each related_field][/each]
At local, i resolve this replacing in file
pods/components/Templates/includes/functions-view_template.php, line 263
by:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions