-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unable to open file: name = '/data/modif_genome_test1/model_selection_l og/model_selection.h5', errno = 2, error message = 'No such file or directory', flags = 0, o_flags = 0 #22
Comments
Can you show more log messages before the screenshot?
The screenshot is the plotting program complaining about the missing input
file (model selection result). But this is usually due to prior errors.
…--
Yu S. Huang
http://www.yfish.org/
https://sites.google.com/site/polyactis/
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 1:15 PM csreej27 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting the following error while trying to run accucopy with various
samples :
*" 5_1] [plot_model_select] IOError: Unable to open file (unable to open
file: name = '/data/modif_genome_test1/model_selection_l
og/model_selection.h5', errno = 2, error message = 'No such file or
directory', flags = 0, o_flags = 0) "*
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/119156694/238537700-df98b22d-5e52-4246-b33b-743aa7010d38.png>
Below is the TRE ratio histogram image for reference :
[image: image]
<https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/119156694/238539588-b07c1853-ded5-476f-b952-55b989fb611e.png>
I would really appreciate it if you could kindly help me troubleshoot the
error.
Thanks,
Sreejita
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF7C2K63T46SMJYKSI636TXGMEP3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sure, I've attached below the three log files that got generated in the folder pyflow.data/logs , for you to have a closer look : |
The purity/ploidy/CNA inference part failed (log below), but without
apparent reason.
Can you send me /data/test_out1/all_segments.tsv.gz,
/data/test_out1/het_snp.tsv.gz , /data/refData/genome.dict?
...
Inferring the best period by log likelihood from 2 candidates ...
### candidate period_int: 80
Finding first peak, period_int: 80, within bounds of (10-1070)...
best_first_peak center: 626
sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 59785.5
half_width_int: 21
Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 80
first peak: 626
lower bound: 605
upper bound: 647
Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
best_logL_snp: -1e+99
no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
purity: -1
ploidy: -1
logL: -1e+99
### candidate period_int: 119
Finding first peak, period_int: 119, within bounds of (10-1079)...
best_first_peak center: 627
sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 53024.6
half_width_int: 21
Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 119
first peak: 627
lower bound: 606
upper bound: 648
Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
best_logL_snp: -1e+99
no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
purity: -1
ploidy: -1
logL: -1e+99
### Best period from likelihood: 0
best_purity: -1
best_ploidy: -1
Q: -1
logL: 0
best_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak: 0
first_peak_center: -1
first_peak_half_width: -1
ERROR: logL 0<=0 or best_purity -1 <=0!
…--
Yu S. Huang
http://www.yfish.org/
https://sites.google.com/site/polyactis/
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 2:12 PM csreej27 ***@***.***> wrote:
Sure,
I've attached below the three log files that got generated in the folder
pyflow.data/logs , for you to have a closer look :
pyflow_log.txt
<https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484540/pyflow_log.txt>
pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt
<https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484541/pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt>
pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt
<https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484542/pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF7C2KS37OXACWRTGZ3E2TXGMLGJANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sure , Here are the files : all_segments.tsv.gz Genome.dict file is not supported to be sent in this github thread - I shall email it to you. |
Hi ,
I have attached the three files you asked for below .
Thanks,
Sreejita
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:26 AM Yu S. Huang ***@***.***>
wrote:
… The purity/ploidy/CNA inference part failed (log below), but without
apparent reason.
Can you send me /data/test_out1/all_segments.tsv.gz,
/data/test_out1/het_snp.tsv.gz , /data/refData/genome.dict?
...
Inferring the best period by log likelihood from 2 candidates ...
### candidate period_int: 80
Finding first peak, period_int: 80, within bounds of (10-1070)...
best_first_peak center: 626
sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 59785.5
half_width_int: 21
Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 80
first peak: 626
lower bound: 605
upper bound: 647
Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
best_logL_snp: -1e+99
no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
purity: -1
ploidy: -1
logL: -1e+99
### candidate period_int: 119
Finding first peak, period_int: 119, within bounds of (10-1079)...
best_first_peak center: 627
sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 53024.6
half_width_int: 21
Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 119
first peak: 627
lower bound: 606
upper bound: 648
Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
best_logL_snp: -1e+99
no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
purity: -1
ploidy: -1
logL: -1e+99
### Best period from likelihood: 0
best_purity: -1
best_ploidy: -1
Q: -1
logL: 0
best_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak: 0
first_peak_center: -1
first_peak_half_width: -1
ERROR: logL 0<=0 or best_purity -1 <=0!
--
Yu S. Huang
http://www.yfish.org/
https://sites.google.com/site/polyactis/
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 2:12 PM csreej27 ***@***.***> wrote:
> Sure,
>
> I've attached below the three log files that got generated in the folder
> pyflow.data/logs , for you to have a closer look :
> pyflow_log.txt
> <https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484540/pyflow_log.txt>
> pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt
> <
https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484541/pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt
>
> pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt
> <
https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484542/pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt
>
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#22 (comment)
>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF7C2KS37OXACWRTGZ3E2TXGMLGJANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q
>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4NC7VWBTWKZI4QLMIIIXFLXG4DSNANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi ,
Thai is just to remind you that I have sent you the files you asked for and
I am awaiting your response.
I would really appreciate it if you could get back ot me as soon as
possible.
Thank you,
Sreejita
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:26 AM Yu S. Huang ***@***.***>
wrote:
… The purity/ploidy/CNA inference part failed (log below), but without
apparent reason.
Can you send me /data/test_out1/all_segments.tsv.gz,
/data/test_out1/het_snp.tsv.gz , /data/refData/genome.dict?
...
Inferring the best period by log likelihood from 2 candidates ...
### candidate period_int: 80
Finding first peak, period_int: 80, within bounds of (10-1070)...
best_first_peak center: 626
sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 59785.5
half_width_int: 21
Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 80
first peak: 626
lower bound: 605
upper bound: 647
Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
best_logL_snp: -1e+99
no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
purity: -1
ploidy: -1
logL: -1e+99
### candidate period_int: 119
Finding first peak, period_int: 119, within bounds of (10-1079)...
best_first_peak center: 627
sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 53024.6
half_width_int: 21
Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 119
first peak: 627
lower bound: 606
upper bound: 648
Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
best_logL_snp: -1e+99
no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
purity: -1
ploidy: -1
logL: -1e+99
### Best period from likelihood: 0
best_purity: -1
best_ploidy: -1
Q: -1
logL: 0
best_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak: 0
first_peak_center: -1
first_peak_half_width: -1
ERROR: logL 0<=0 or best_purity -1 <=0!
--
Yu S. Huang
http://www.yfish.org/
https://sites.google.com/site/polyactis/
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 2:12 PM csreej27 ***@***.***> wrote:
> Sure,
>
> I've attached below the three log files that got generated in the folder
> pyflow.data/logs , for you to have a closer look :
> pyflow_log.txt
> <https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484540/pyflow_log.txt>
> pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt
> <
https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484541/pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt
>
> pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt
> <
https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484542/pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt
>
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#22 (comment)
>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF7C2KS37OXACWRTGZ3E2TXGMLGJANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q
>
> .
> You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4NC7VWBTWKZI4QLMIIIXFLXG4DSNANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Apologies for the late reply! Was only able to check this email a few days
ago :)
There was a stupid bug in our program that puts a limit on the maximum
ploidy possible (4). I removed it and re-made the docker image. Please pull
the latest docker image.
Here the output after bugfix. Inferred purity is 0.25. The ploidy 6.67 is a
bit wonky because in the end, the ploidy based on all segments's inferred
copy number status is ploidy_cnv_all=2.53699 (in the last lines of the
cnv output file). Is your sample an exome or a panel?
### Best period from likelihood: 80
best_purity: 0.255591
best_ploidy: 6.675
Q: 626
logL: 1.37095e+06
best_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak: 2
first_peak_center: 626
first_peak_half_width: 21
Outputting copy number to output/cnv.output.tsv
copy number: 2
copy number: 3
copy number: 4
copy number: 5
copy number: 6
copy number: 7
copy number: 8
copy number: 9
copy number: 10
copy number: 11
copy number: 12
copy number: 13
copy number: 14
copy number: 15
copy number: 16
copy number: 17
copy number: 18
copy number: 19
copy number: 20
copy number: 21
copy number: 22
copy number: 23
copy number: 24
copy number: 25
copy number: 26
copy number: 27
copy number: 28
copy number: 29
copy number: 30
copy number: 31
For subclone regions
CNV output done. ploidy_cnv_all=2.53699 ploidy_clonal=2.37565
Outputting logL ...Done.
Outputting SNP logORs by peaks to output/snp_logOR_by_peak.tsv ... 7 peaks
with valid data.
Outputting RC ratio of peaks to
output/rc_ratios_of_peaks_of_best_period.tsv ... 1284 segments.
Outputting peak bounds to output/peak_bounds.tsv ... 30 peaks.
…--
Yu S. Huang
http://www.yfish.org/
https://sites.google.com/site/polyactis/
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:48 AM csreej27 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi ,
Thai is just to remind you that I have sent you the files you asked for and
I am awaiting your response.
I would really appreciate it if you could get back ot me as soon as
possible.
Thank you,
Sreejita
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 11:26 AM Yu S. Huang ***@***.***>
wrote:
> The purity/ploidy/CNA inference part failed (log below), but without
> apparent reason.
>
> Can you send me /data/test_out1/all_segments.tsv.gz,
> /data/test_out1/het_snp.tsv.gz , /data/refData/genome.dict?
>
> ...
> Inferring the best period by log likelihood from 2 candidates ...
> ### candidate period_int: 80
> Finding first peak, period_int: 80, within bounds of (10-1070)...
> best_first_peak center: 626
> sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 59785.5
> half_width_int: 21
> Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 80
> first peak: 626
> lower bound: 605
> upper bound: 647
> Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
> First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
> no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
> max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
> best_logL_snp: -1e+99
> no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
> purity: -1
> ploidy: -1
> logL: -1e+99
> ### candidate period_int: 119
> Finding first peak, period_int: 119, within bounds of (10-1079)...
> best_first_peak center: 627
> sum of window count at all periodic peaks: 53024.6
> half_width_int: 21
> Find_first_peak_ab_init() for period: 119
> first peak: 627
> lower bound: 606
> upper bound: 648
> Tallest peak index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
> First peak's peak_index=0, peak_center_int=626, no_of_windows=244912.
> no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak_prior=2
> max_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak=2
> best_logL_snp: -1e+99
> no_of_peaks_for_logL: 3
> purity: -1
> ploidy: -1
> logL: -1e+99
> ### Best period from likelihood: 0
> best_purity: -1
> best_ploidy: -1
> Q: -1
> logL: 0
> best_no_of_copy_nos_bf_1st_peak: 0
> first_peak_center: -1
> first_peak_half_width: -1
> ERROR: logL 0<=0 or best_purity -1 <=0!
>
>
> --
> Yu S. Huang
> http://www.yfish.org/
> https://sites.google.com/site/polyactis/
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 2:12 PM csreej27 ***@***.***> wrote:
>
> > Sure,
> >
> > I've attached below the three log files that got generated in the
folder
> > pyflow.data/logs , for you to have a closer look :
> > pyflow_log.txt
> > <https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484540/pyflow_log.txt>
> > pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt
> > <
>
https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484541/pyflow_tasks_stderr_log.txt
> >
> > pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt
> > <
>
https://github.com/polyactis/Accucopy/files/11484542/pyflow_tasks_stdout_log.txt
> >
> >
> > —
> > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> > <
#22 (comment)
> >,
> > or unsubscribe
> > <
>
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF7C2KS37OXACWRTGZ3E2TXGMLGJANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q
> >
> > .
> > You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
> > ***@***.***>
> >
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#22 (comment)
>,
> or unsubscribe
> <
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A4NC7VWBTWKZI4QLMIIIXFLXG4DSNANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q
>
> .
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
> ***@***.***>
>
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAF7C2JPETXVKRFA43GXTC3XH3JATANCNFSM6AAAAAAYDDBC5Q>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi,
I'm getting the following error while trying to run accucopy with various samples :
" 5_1] [plot_model_select] IOError: Unable to open file (unable to open file: name = '/data/modif_genome_test1/model_selection_l
og/model_selection.h5', errno = 2, error message = 'No such file or directory', flags = 0, o_flags = 0) "
Below is the TRE ratio histogram image for reference :
I would really appreciate it if you could kindly help me troubleshoot the error.
Thanks,
Sreejita
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: