Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider using FastTreeSHAP? #41

Open
almostintuitive opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Consider using FastTreeSHAP? #41

almostintuitive opened this issue May 26, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@almostintuitive
Copy link
Contributor

https://engineering.linkedin.com/blog/2022/fasttreeshap--accelerating-shap-value-computation-for-trees
It looks like it's a drop-in replacement, which we'll start testing next week!
@almostintuitive
Copy link
Contributor Author

We have been using FastTreeSharp for over a month now, has excellent performance and is an order of mangitude smaller library than shap, which is for some reason, huge. the API is exactly the same, we definitely recommend switching over!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@almostintuitive