-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature request: Alpine-based image #23
Comments
The problem with alpine-based images is that they don't ship glibc. Thus, the |
Right, we are using PyTorch which I see requires So, would it be possible to use the same Either way, great work on |
Hi @pavelzw 👋 I created a Gist with the Would it be possible to add this to the repository and publish it alongside the other Pixi images? |
Did you try out whether Also, but this might be irrelevant in your use case: you could take a look at multi stage docker builds where you don't include pixi in the final image but only the hook to activate the environment using |
Hi @pavelzw , Frustratingly, no, installing Python does not work :'( I like your suggestion of a multi-stage Docker build, although I am unsure if it will actually work. I will give it a try |
@pavelzw So the multi-stage build did not work for me unfortunately, however, I found that by switching my base image to |
Here is an example of a multi-stage build: https://github.com/prefix-dev/pixi/blob/main/examples/docker/Dockerfile @wolfv do you know why in |
I am not entirely sure, I wonder if it is related to the
|
@pavelzw Should I take a further look at the differences between |
Hi 👋 ,
I'd really like it if you could provide an
alpine
based image. It would help us to keep our images slim and consistentThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: