You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is not yet evidently anything in the civil law to match the common law's Restatements. How, then, could Ulex be made more usable for Europeans and others unaccustomed to the common law?
One place where Ulex could be made more international: Using the UN's "Convention for the International Sale of Goods" (CISG) in place of the ALI's "Restatement (2d) Contracts" (the default rule in Ulex v. 1.1).
The CISG is not a perfect substitute for the R. (2d) of Contracts, though, and the change, while perhaps a graceful touch, would still leave Ulex very common-law-based.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There is not yet evidently anything in the civil law to match the common law's Restatements. How, then, could Ulex be made more usable for Europeans and others unaccustomed to the common law?
One place where Ulex could be made more international: Using the UN's "Convention for the International Sale of Goods" (CISG) in place of the ALI's "Restatement (2d) Contracts" (the default rule in Ulex v. 1.1).
The CISG is not a perfect substitute for the R. (2d) of Contracts, though, and the change, while perhaps a graceful touch, would still leave Ulex very common-law-based.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: