Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does Ulex need copyright rules? #5

Open
proftomwbell opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 8 comments
Open

Does Ulex need copyright rules? #5

proftomwbell opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 8 comments

Comments

@proftomwbell
Copy link
Owner

Ulex 1.1 has no default copyright rules. Should it? If so, which ones? If not . . . what would happen to litigants bringing claims under Ulex?

@danielkrainas
Copy link

I would suggest CC0 if you really don't care about the copyright and don't want to think about it again, otherwise something more conservative would be CC-BY-SA 2.0

@proftomwbell
Copy link
Owner Author

Thanks but that answers a different question: Under what copyright should Ulex be published? The answer to that has been set as you suggest, CC0.

The question here is: Should Ulex include among its rule sets, such as those for contracts, for torts, etc., a set of rules restricting non-original expressions.

@danielkrainas
Copy link

@proftomwbell my mistake

@Arbitrage0
Copy link
Contributor

As a starting point, WIPO Principles of Copyright? (with multi-jurisdictional cases/materials)
http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/copyright/844/wipo_pub_844.pdf

@Arbitrage0
Copy link
Contributor

The non-profit EIFL has a model copyright law that they've been developing for transition countries across the globe which is more specific: http://libguides.wits.ac.za/ld.php?content_id=6300645

@proftomwbell
Copy link
Owner Author

@Arbitrage0 : the EIFL document, though a work in progress, looks very good. Not that I agree with all the specific substantive laws; see Intellectual Privilege for that. Point is: This looks like a reasonably objective private source of simple and accessible copyright rules.

Thank you!

@Arbitrage0
Copy link
Contributor

@proftomwbell no worries! I will take a look at Intellectual Privilege, but at the very outset I am presuming that we aren't bound by one particular source for the project (or even international law / conventions re: TRIPS or Berne for that matter).

Thus, we could make our own modifications to the EIFL's substantive laws after discussions. This was just to get a framework out there.

@Arbitrage0
Copy link
Contributor

Arbitrage0 commented Sep 11, 2018

On the subject of intellectual property, would it be worth searching for Model Patent Law as well?

For example, there is the WIPO Model Law for Developing Countries on Inventions (with commentary, but all the way back from 1980, so it's terribly outdated; and definitely not a "private source" of rules).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants