Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Mark private forests in RDP #75

Open
marlonrodrigues opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

Mark private forests in RDP #75

marlonrodrigues opened this issue Jan 2, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
data Issues dealing with external data to be displayed on the platform

Comments

@marlonrodrigues
Copy link
Collaborator

marlonrodrigues commented Jan 2, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Goa recognises forests in Private Land, and only limited orchard-based activities can be carried out there.

  1. Study by Sawant and Karapurkar mapped in RP
  2. Study by Thomas and Araujo not mapped in RP
  3. Areas removed in case-by-case basis by minister from T&A. (All S&K areas that were previously removed when Pramod Sawant was forest minister were returned as forest due to Goa Foundation court case)

Describe the solution you'd like

Mark a layer of private forests by survey numbers

Describe alternatives you've considered

Leave situation as is

Additional context

Via TN:

  • Sawant and Karapurkar are mapped in the RP
  • Swapnesh has tabulated Araujo,
  • Thomas needs to be tabulated.
  • Anthony is helping me tabulate case-by-case removals.
@marlonrodrigues
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thomas to complete in Feb

Marlon to check back in

@planemad planemad added the data Issues dealing with external data to be displayed on the platform label Jan 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
data Issues dealing with external data to be displayed on the platform
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@planemad @marlonrodrigues