Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo in pulumi-okta property groups_included #140

Open
jaxxstorm opened this issue Jan 1, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Typo in pulumi-okta property groups_included #140

jaxxstorm opened this issue Jan 1, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
area/docs Improvements or additions to documentation kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec

Comments

@jaxxstorm
Copy link
Contributor

image

@stack72
Copy link
Contributor

stack72 commented Jan 2, 2022

@jaxxstorm going to move this issue to the Pulumi-okta repo as this actually reflects the SDK directly

This is because "groups_included" is a set and we pluralise any collections where MaxItems is not 1

@stack72 stack72 transferred this issue from pulumi/docs Jan 2, 2022
@stack72 stack72 self-assigned this Jan 2, 2022
@stack72 stack72 removed their assignment Sep 20, 2022
@mnlumi
Copy link

mnlumi commented Jul 28, 2023

This is still reflective of the API docs today.
Screenshot 2023-07-28 at 1 30 05 PM

@mnlumi mnlumi added the kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec label Jul 28, 2023
@joeduffy
Copy link
Member

joeduffy commented Nov 9, 2023

@mnlumi @mikhailshilkov I had a community member raise this with me in person yesterday, and express their disappointment that it's still active nearly two years later. Do we have a path to fixing things like this?

I realize it seems like a minor paper cut, but these paper cuts add up fast!

I also ask because it would seem to require a breaking change to fix? Or do we have a way to add "property aliases"?

@mjeffryes mjeffryes added the area/docs Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/docs Improvements or additions to documentation kind/bug Some behavior is incorrect or out of spec
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants