Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Vendor prefixes #155

Open
nsaunders opened this issue Mar 19, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Vendor prefixes #155

nsaunders opened this issue Mar 19, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@nsaunders
Copy link
Member

I wonder whether vendor prefixes are better addressed as a separate concern by another tool (specifically Autoprefixer), considering the following:

  1. CSS output size could be reduced, since Autoprefixer uses Browserslist.
  2. Because it's specifically focused on this problem (and, judging by its 20k stars, has more eyes on it), Autoprefixer likely has better coverage.
  3. This codebase could be simplified.
  4. purescript-css' implementation (lifted from Clay) is...semi-broken?
  5. (Perhaps unlike Clay) purescript-css is written in a language that has an easy and convenient JavaScript FFI. 👍

If anyone would miss this functionality, would be significantly inconvenienced by having to use Autoprefixer, or simply has some thoughts to share, please let me know!
@JordanMartinez
Copy link
Contributor

I think this makes sense!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nsaunders @JordanMartinez