Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pusher with encryption, window is not defined on Next.js #624

Open
semoal opened this issue Aug 12, 2022 · 16 comments · May be fixed by #819
Open

Pusher with encryption, window is not defined on Next.js #624

semoal opened this issue Aug 12, 2022 · 16 comments · May be fixed by #819

Comments

@semoal
Copy link

semoal commented Aug 12, 2022

Do you want to request a feature or report a bug?
Bug
What is the current behavior?

import Pusher from "pusher-js/with-encryption";

If the current behavior is a bug, please provide the steps to reproduce and
if possible a minimal demo of the problem via https://jsfiddle.net or similar.

  • Create a next app
  • Install pusher-js@latest
  • import Pusher from "pusher-js/with-encryption";
  • Will crash about window is not defined

What is the expected behavior?
Should handle if the lib is being imported in SSR and just early return.

Which versions of Pusher, and which browsers / OS are affected by this issue?
Did this work in previous versions of Pusher? If so, which?

7.3.0 - latest

@benjamin-tang-pusher
Copy link

Hi, do you also get this issue with the default Next.js static site generation?

@semoal
Copy link
Author

semoal commented Aug 21, 2022

Hi, do you also get this issue with the default Next.js static site generation?

Not sure, probably yes. We’re just using traditional SSR, meanwhile I’m lazy loading the lib inside a Suspense boundary with SSR:false

@benjamin-tang-pusher
Copy link

I can reproduce, will escalate.

@webbipage
Copy link

Same issue.

@benjamin-tang-pusher
Copy link

I'm starting to suspect the entrypoint for /with-encryption isn't working well with Next. Bear with us as this is being prioritised.

@ardalan-nhd
Copy link

I have the same issue with next V12.3.1 and pusher-js V7.4.1. I solved this issue temporarily by using require("pusher-js/with-encryption") inside a useEffect and assigning it to a ref. Hope this gets fixed soon. Thanks in advance.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Mar 11, 2023

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. If you'd like this issue to stay open please leave a comment indicating how this issue is affecting you. Thank you.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Mar 11, 2023
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Mar 19, 2023
@semoal
Copy link
Author

semoal commented Mar 19, 2023

Not staled guys

@ivan3123708
Copy link

I have the same issue. It's definitely something related to /with-encryption because it works fine when I use import Pusher from 'pusher-js'.

@tmirkovic
Copy link

Having same issue here with version 8.3.0:
https://replit.com/@TiborMirkovic/Pusher-with-encryption-window-issue

Happens when we subscribe to the private-encrypted- channel

@jessethomson
Copy link

jessethomson commented Nov 16, 2023

I have same issue with [email protected] using [email protected].

I don't want to be that guy, but I am totally going to be that guy...

I just started using Pusher today because another developer had recommended it. I am currently setting everything up for a proof of concept, with the thought that if all goes well, our company will likely purchase the Pro plan.

However, the lack of good documentation and the fact that an issue this simple has sat open for over a year gives me a lot of hesitation to move forward. Maybe I'm missing something, but this fix should be as simple as a typeof check with an early return?

If this was just some random open source library, I would never complain. But this is an SDK for a paid enterprise product and there are only 13 open issues so you would think staying on top of something like this wouldn't be so hard.

@razvangherghina
Copy link

plus one, with nextjs pusher-js/with-encryption cannot be used without require due to window is not defined error.

@AlexVipond
Copy link

I suspect this is happening because pusher-js/with-encryption is bundled as UMD with a reference to window in code that executes immediately at runtime.

libraryTarget: 'umd'

This is not the correct module format for projects using import—Pusher should be distributing ESM or CJS builds for those projects.

@AlexVipond
Copy link

AlexVipond commented May 3, 2024

Made my own CJS build just now, which gets you past the initial window error, but you still run into two more several more, including these two:

First one:

var btoa =
global.btoa ||
function(b) {
return b.replace(/[\s\S]{1,3}/g, cb_encode);
};

Second one is here:

if (window.addEventListener !== undefined) {

And it triggers because of this NetInfo instantiation in global scope:

export var Network = new NetInfo();

The correct solution here is to avoid performing side effects in global scope. Instead, Pusher should ship functions that we can call when & where appropriate in our apps to do the necessary setup work.

A quick fix is to guard these two code execution paths by checking typeof window !== 'undefined'. That seemed to work fine for me, but I don't know if it has any unintended consequences.

@AlexVipond
Copy link

PR is up with a fix that works in my NextJS 12.x app.

Also worth noting for anyone in this thread: if you wrote import Pusher from 'pusher-js', you're importing the NodeJS build (dist/node/pusher.js) instead of the browser build (dist/web/pusher.js), because that's where the package.json sends you. If you switch to import Pusher from 'pusher-js/dist/web/pusher' to force the browser build, you'll get the same window is not defined error from the UMD format.

@dmvdven
Copy link

dmvdven commented Aug 26, 2024

Any update on this matter? I'm using NextJS version 15.0.0-canary.58 and import Pusher from "pusher-js/with-encryption";. It also gives me the window is not defined message.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

10 participants