Refactor do_check routine to be more modular and address concerns about quiet flag #6277
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ut the quiet flag yielding too much output
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Thank you for contributing to Pipenv!
The issue
Fixes #6228
The fix
Leveraged Google Gemini-1.5 large context to give a concise summary of image and proposed fix, given context of the complete code base. I think fed this into Claude manually and replaced the routine for do_check, and initiated test run.
The checklist
news/directory to describe this fix with the extension.bugfix.rst,.feature.rst,.behavior.rst,.doc.rst..vendor.rst. or.trivial.rst(this will appear in the release changelog). Use semantic line breaks and name the file after the issue number or the PR #.