You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to cut a new release on Monday or Tuesday, preferably one that will include #1576.
I think most changes in the changelog are backwards-compatible, so we could do 40.5.0, but depending on your view, #1554 or #1545 may be considered backwards-incompatible. I'd also like to get #1559 merged, and I consider that a bugfix, but it's possible that people might consider it backwards incompatible. Anyone have thoughts on whether we should do 40.5.0 or 41.0.0?
Also, is there anything that anyone wants to get prioritized for inclusion in the next release?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree that some of those do seem like they could cause incompatibilities. My rule of thumb on when to bump the major version is if the incompatibility is likely to require user intervention to accommodate the change, it should have a major bump and the changelog should describe what intervention is expected. If the likelihood of intervention is negligible, then no docs are needed and no major bump is indicated.
I think #1559 in particular qualifies as backward-incompatible.
I would like to cut a new release on Monday or Tuesday, preferably one that will include #1576.
I think most changes in the changelog are backwards-compatible, so we could do
40.5.0
, but depending on your view, #1554 or #1545 may be considered backwards-incompatible. I'd also like to get #1559 merged, and I consider that a bugfix, but it's possible that people might consider it backwards incompatible. Anyone have thoughts on whether we should do40.5.0
or41.0.0
?Also, is there anything that anyone wants to get prioritized for inclusion in the next release?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: