You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
How would we feel about adding type hints to the pyperformance codebase?
Running a type checker on pyperformance might catch some bugs. But more importantly, in my opinion, it would make some parts of the code base a lot easier to read and reason about -- it would be self-evident what kind of object is being accepted and returned by various functions.
There are various tools that we could use to add "obvious" type hints quickly to the code base, such as autotyping and MonkeyType.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
How would we feel about adding type hints to the pyperformance codebase?
Running a type checker on pyperformance might catch some bugs. But more importantly, in my opinion, it would make some parts of the code base a lot easier to read and reason about -- it would be self-evident what kind of object is being accepted and returned by various functions.
There are various tools that we could use to add "obvious" type hints quickly to the code base, such as autotyping and MonkeyType.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: