Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
I like the grouping proposed by @Baltmann01 better because it is content driven. The frequency might also change over time if documentation is improved for some issues. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Background
As we get started on these first few issues of the cookbook, I'm a little stumped on how to organize our content.
The first skeleton draft had
.qmd
files for common, occasional and infrequent issues to correspond with the sidebar section labels. The current set of identified issues that @Baltmann01 put together has a different grouping of:Discussion question
Should we first label each of the issues by frequency of occurrence to determine which section they might fall into?
Should we add just a general issues/best practice section? (I think we might have discussed this in our last team meeting 🤔 )
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions