generated from r4ds/bookclub-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
/
Copy path02_research-questions.Rmd
89 lines (67 loc) · 2.96 KB
/
02_research-questions.Rmd
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
# Research Questions
**Learning objectives:**
- Define what a Research Question is
- Compare Data Mining and Research Questions
- Determine if a question is good
## What is a Research Question? {-}
- Section 2.1 p. 9-12, Section 2.3 p. 15-16
- When answered, will improve understanding of how the world works.
- There exists data when found results in believable answer
- Can be Answerable with evidence: Avoid ambiguous questions such as "best"
- It should inform theory: answer something broader than itself
- Theory
- Tells us why
- May be True or False - but explains why we might see outcomes
- Good Question takes us from Theory to Hypothesis
- When answered improves ability to explain why
- If this is how the world works, what should I expect to observe?
- Gives us something new about why
- Theory -> Research Question or Research Question -> Theory
- Right data for right questions
- Two Checks for Condition for Research Question:
1. Could we answer the question?
2. Does the question tell us about how the world works?
- Checks if Research Question Informs Theory:
1. Would unexpected result change your understanding of the world?
2. If unexpected result doesn't change understanding, then bad question
3. If answered, hard to explain away if inconvenient
## Data Mining vs. Research Q's {-}
- Section 2.2 p.13 - 16
- Data Mining is good at finding patterns and making predictions under stability
- Not good at improving understanding nor improve theory main reason are:
1. Answers what's in the data , not explaining why. Correlation != Causation
2. Does not deal with abstraction, can see observations but not at developing theory
3. Results in false positives - observations found in sample but not outside of it. Random relationships eventually occur when testing everything
- Can lead to Research Questions
- Come to data without a theory, noticed interesting data patterns
- Confirm it holds up in other data aka replication of data patterns
## Considerations for a good Research Q {-}
- Section 2.3 p. 15-16, Section 2.4 p. 16-18
- Sources of Questions:
- Curiosity
- Theory
- If this is what I expect the world to work, what would I expect to see in the world?
- Opportunity
- What questions would this data allow me to answer?
- Research Questions tells us why hypothesis to test
1. Potential Results
- If you cant say something interesting from results, Question and Theory not closely linked
2. Feasibility
- Possible vs. Realistically Obtainable Data
3. Scale
- Consider time, resource constraints
4. Design
- Finding a reasonable research design that can answer it
5. Simplicity
- Don't combine multiple determinants into the question to answer
## Discussion/Practicals {-}
Questions, Discussions, or Examples to fill in during Book Club Meeting
## Meeting Videos {-}
### Cohort 1 {-}
`r knitr::include_url("https://www.youtube.com/embed/URL")`
<details>
<summary> Meeting chat log </summary>
```
LOG
```
</details>