You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note the empty line after the (foo 1 2 3 4) output.
I tried a lot to achieve this with scribble/example, but didn't succeed. Things that almost worked:
(code:comment "") still prints the semicolon
code:blank and (code:line) add a prompt in front of the otherwise empty line
(eval:no-prompt code:blank) adds two or three empty lines
(eval:no-prompt (code:line)) gives an exception because (code:line) doesn't seem to be recognized inside (eval:no-prompt).
(eval:no-prompt) adds a tiny gap. I was (kinda) able to get an "empty line" with a sequence of (eval:no-prompt), but that's quite a dirty hack, isn't it? ;-)
Split the @examples[...] invocations into several, one for each group. This requires #:label #f for the groups after the first and duplication of possible setup / keyword arguments from the first @examples[...] of the group.
I found a few examples in the Racket documentation that do use empty lines as shown above, but they use mz-examples, or examples from the legacy scribble/eval module.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
sschwarzer
added a commit
to sschwarzer/racket-glossary
that referenced
this issue
Jun 17, 2022
I want a visual separation of the independent examples, but didn't find
a straightforward way to do this. Splitting `@examples` into several is
my current workaround.
I entered an issue at racket/scribble#331 .
Sometimes I want to group lines in an
@examples
form, i.e. insert empty lines between groups of inputs and outputs.Here's an example from the documentation of define-syntax to show what I mean:
However, since the
foo
andbar
examples are independent, these examples would look clearer asNote the empty line after the
(foo 1 2 3 4)
output.I tried a lot to achieve this with
scribble/example
, but didn't succeed. Things that almost worked:(code:comment "")
still prints the semicoloncode:blank
and(code:line)
add a prompt in front of the otherwise empty line(eval:no-prompt code:blank)
adds two or three empty lines(eval:no-prompt (code:line))
gives an exception because(code:line)
doesn't seem to be recognized inside(eval:no-prompt)
.(eval:no-prompt)
adds a tiny gap. I was (kinda) able to get an "empty line" with a sequence of(eval:no-prompt)
, but that's quite a dirty hack, isn't it? ;-)@examples[...]
invocations into several, one for each group. This requires#:label #f
for the groups after the first and duplication of possible setup / keyword arguments from the first@examples[...]
of the group.I found a few examples in the Racket documentation that do use empty lines as shown above, but they use
mz-examples
, orexamples
from the legacyscribble/eval
module.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: