We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug Hi,
I am reading the following blog, and when I try to reproduce the example notebooks, the results do not match.
https://medium.com/rapids-ai/essential-machine-learning-with-linear-models-in-rapids-part-1-of-a-series-992fab0240da
In my testing, the best result is always MSE_OLS_THEORY, and not MSE_RIDGE, as stated in the blog.
Any ideas why is this happening? Could the code be updated to make reproducible results similar to the blog?
Steps/Code to reproduce bug I am usign todays rapids nightly build from Dockerhub.
I have git cloned the notebooks-contrib repo (master, v0.11) and run the cells.
Expected behavior Same results as in the blog.
Environment details (please complete the following information): DGX-1
Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
Hi,
I am reading the following blog, and when I try to reproduce the example notebooks, the results do not match.
https://medium.com/rapids-ai/essential-machine-learning-with-linear-models-in-rapids-part-1-of-a-series-992fab0240da
In my testing, the best result is always MSE_OLS_THEORY, and not MSE_RIDGE, as stated in the blog.
Any ideas why is this happening? Could the code be updated to make reproducible results similar to the blog?
Steps/Code to reproduce bug
I am usign todays rapids nightly build from Dockerhub.
I have git cloned the notebooks-contrib repo (master, v0.11) and run the cells.
Expected behavior
Same results as in the blog.
Environment details (please complete the following information):
DGX-1
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: