You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The meaning of ‘hasFloeSize’ seems ambiguous: sometimes is seems to be used to indicate diameters of individual ‘Floats’ and sometimes to indicate maximum diameters of pieces within ice accumulations. This also casts doubt on the specification of Floe as subclass of Sea Ice. Perhaps Floes and Ice Accumulations should be more clearly distinguished, and hasFloeSize used only in connection with Floes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
From ESIP report:
The meaning of ‘hasFloeSize’ seems ambiguous: sometimes is seems to be used to indicate diameters of individual ‘Floats’ and sometimes to indicate maximum diameters of pieces within ice accumulations. This also casts doubt on the specification of Floe as subclass of Sea Ice. Perhaps Floes and Ice Accumulations should be more clearly distinguished, and hasFloeSize used only in connection with Floes?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: