You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, RobotId proto messages sent for the robot number 0 does not have the mandatory field RobotId.number because protobuf 3 does not serialize default values (see here).
As explicit typing this field as optional is a semantic mislead but employs desired behavior of field serialization when default values are set.
A better approach should be implemented to deal with this issue so we can have semantic coherence alongside functionality. A possible solution was discussed at #51
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently,
RobotId
proto messages sent for the robot number 0 does not have the mandatory fieldRobotId.number
because protobuf 3 does not serialize default values (see here).As explicit typing this field as optional is a semantic mislead but employs desired behavior of field serialization when default values are set.
A better approach should be implemented to deal with this issue so we can have semantic coherence alongside functionality. A possible solution was discussed at #51
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: