You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, VirtualXYZUnit is a sort of XYZUnit, which refers to an underlying XYZUnit. It causes some confusion in the code, ie it is not clear whether the actual or virtual axis is moved. I propose to merge VirtualXYZUnit into XYZUnit, using the prefix virtual (eg virtual_absolute_move), or a keyword (virtual = True).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, VirtualXYZUnit is a sort of XYZUnit, which refers to an underlying XYZUnit. It causes some confusion in the code, ie it is not clear whether the actual or virtual axis is moved. I propose to merge VirtualXYZUnit into XYZUnit, using the prefix virtual (eg virtual_absolute_move), or a keyword (virtual = True).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: