(Testing for badges) - bizbaz submission

[sckott]

Submitting Author: Jane Doe (@janedoe)
Repository: https://github.com/janedoe/bizbaz
Version submitted: 1.04
Submission type: Stats
Badge grade: bronze
Editor: TBD
Reviewers: TBD

Archive: TBD
Version accepted: TBD

---

• Paste the full DESCRIPTION file inside a code block below:

Package: bizbaz
Type: Package
Title: Biz Baz
Version: 1.04
Authors@R: person("Jane", "Doe", role = c("aut", "cre"),
    email = "[email protected]")
BugReports: https://github.com/janedoe/bizbaz/issues
Description: Provides ....
License: MIT + file LICENSE
Imports:
    countrycode

General Information

• Who is the target audience and what are scientific applications of this package?

• Paste your responses to our General Standard G1.1 here, describing whether your software is:

  • The first implementation of a novel algorithm; or
  • The first implementation within R of an algorithm which has previously been implemented in other languages or contexts; or
  • An improvement on other implementations of similar algorithms in R.

  Please include hyperlinked references to all other relevant software.

• (If applicable) Does your package comply with our guidance around Ethics, Data Privacy and Human Subjects Research?

Badging

• What grade of badge are you aiming for? (bronze, silver, gold)

• If aiming for silver or gold, describe which of the four aspects listed in the Guide for Authors chapter the package fulfils (at least one aspect for silver; three for gold)

Technical checks

Confirm each of the following by checking the box.

• I/we have read the guide for authors and rOpenSci packaging guide.
• I/we have read the Statistical Software Peer Review Guide for Authors.
• I/we have run autotest checks on the package, and ensured no tests fail.
• The srr_stats_pre_submit() function confirms this package may be submitted.

This package:

• does not violate the Terms of Service of any service it interacts with.
• has a CRAN and OSI accepted license.
• contains a README with instructions for installing the development version.

Publication options

• Do you intend for this package to go on CRAN?
• Do you intend for this package to go on Bioconductor?

Code of conduct

• I agree to abide by rOpenSci's Code of Conduct during the review process and in maintaining my package should it be accepted.

[sckott]

@ropensci-review-bot help

[ropensci-review-bot]

Hello @sckott, here are the things you can ask me to do:

# List all available commands
@ropensci-review-bot help

# Show our Code of Conduct
@ropensci-review-bot code of conduct