You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be good to add more meaningful system dependencies to our python builds. At the moment a user can successfully install python built for RHEL9 on CentOS 7 without any problem but then wonders why pip does not work. One would then get
/opt/python/3.9.15/bin/python3.9: error while loading shared libraries: libcrypt.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I know that our python builds are opinionated, but it still would be good to add clear dependencies to the RPMs that one could extract at build time like the one below
insisting that libcrypt be available would make it more likely that the rpm will fail to install, rather than installing successfully and then failing at run time.
we should consider improvements to the design of the install python documentation to reduce the probability that someone ends up with the wrong RPM
It would be good to add more meaningful system dependencies to our python builds. At the moment a user can successfully install python built for RHEL9 on CentOS 7 without any problem but then wonders why
pip
does not work. One would then getI know that our python builds are opinionated, but it still would be good to add clear dependencies to the RPMs that one could extract at build time like the one below
At the moment I can see
which is a bit too small IMHO. I'd expect to see references to
libcrypt*
andlibfreebl*
in their respective versions at a minimum.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: