You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 2, 2021. It is now read-only.
Are there any specific reason that a permissive license like MIT is used? Can a copyleft license like LGPL for the framework, which lets its usage at proprietary projects but prevents the framework's source code being stolen?
Difference of LGPL and GPL, and why LGPL is suitable for libraries and won't cause you a problem at all about compatibility with commercial stuff while protecting your source code with copyleft: https://www.difference.wiki/gpl-vs-lgpl/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Are there any specific reason that a permissive license like MIT is used? Can a copyleft license like LGPL for the framework, which lets its usage at proprietary projects but prevents the framework's source code being stolen?
You can take a look about the comparison of copyleft and permissive here: https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/21/whats-the-difference-between-permissive-and-copyleft-licenses
Difference of LGPL and GPL, and why LGPL is suitable for libraries and won't cause you a problem at all about compatibility with commercial stuff while protecting your source code with copyleft: https://www.difference.wiki/gpl-vs-lgpl/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: