Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x1264—As TS (Katy) I want to put different thickness of sections on a slide (6 slot slide, Visium TO, Visium LP, 4 slot slide & Xenium) during sectioning, for hta purposes and differences in tissue types #859

Closed
khelwood opened this issue Jan 7, 2025 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@khelwood
Copy link
Contributor

khelwood commented Jan 7, 2025

Specify a thickness per slot, with option to apply to all.
This already works for section registration but needs changing for Section Planning.

@khelwood
Copy link
Contributor Author

khelwood commented Jan 7, 2025

@KatyTudor My reading of how it currently works is that you specify thicknesses during section planning, but this story mentions section confirmation. Does it mean planning?

@KatyTudor
Copy link

@khelwood we specify the the thickness of the the planning page yes. We don't normally do anything on the confirmation page about the thickness, just setting and confirming SGP number and section numbers plus comments. I think its a typo on my side in the story should be planning not confirmation page

@sabrine33 sabrine33 self-assigned this Jan 15, 2025
@KatyTudor
Copy link

@sabrine33 @khelwood we only need the thickness for slots that have a section in, so empty slots on the labware won't need a section thickness

@sabrine33
Copy link
Contributor

@KatyTudor Thank you for testing it, I will have a look into it

@khelwood
Copy link
Contributor Author

khelwood commented Feb 3, 2025

@KatyTudor Stan UAT has been updated for this.

@KatyTudor
Copy link

@khelwood @sabrine33 that is working great thanks guys

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants