You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The problem with Uadd's is the combinatorial explosion. Image that for source U1 we find N and for source U2M systems if both are used independently (i.e. not in combination). The systems of this sources could be combined in N*M ways!
However, the systems we care most are the once with some synergies. That means systems that are partly similar for U1 and U2 so that they can share techs. With the following algorithm we would check for every combination if synergies are possible (in most cases this will not be the case) and only if this is the case construct a new, combined system.
Let say sys1 is a system of U1 and sys2 from U2
Do sys1 and sys2 share some techs? If not, break
Are the shared techs connected in the same order? If not, break
Build a combined system
3.1. combine techs and connections (without dublications)
3.2. add new connections
3.3 update SAS and other properties
Idea to tackle Uadd's (#50)
The problem with Uadd's is the combinatorial explosion. Image that for source
U1
we findN
and for sourceU2
M
systems if both are used independently (i.e. not in combination). The systems of this sources could be combined inN*M
ways!However, the systems we care most are the once with some synergies. That means systems that are partly similar for
U1
andU2
so that they can share techs. With the following algorithm we would check for every combination if synergies are possible (in most cases this will not be the case) and only if this is the case construct a new, combined system.Let say
sys1
is a system ofU1
andsys2
fromU2
sys1
andsys2
share some techs? If not, break3.1. combine techs and connections (without dublications)
3.2. add new connections
3.3 update
SAS
and other propertiesWorkflow
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: