Excluding lines of code from coverage testing

[aleybovich]

Is there a way to exclude some solidity code from coverage testing, like its done in JS with istanbul directives in comments?

[cgewecke]

@aleybovich Currently there is not. Agree this might be useful in some cases though.

[aleybovich]

@cgewecke Is this something you are planning to do or should I close this issue?

[cgewecke]

@aleybovich I think it should stay open - tagging it as a possible enhancement.

[chapati23]

maybe just adopt the existing istanbul interface for ignoring code for coverage ?

[cgewecke]

@chapati23 Thanks for that link!

[aleybovich]

@cgewecke - are you planning to implement this in the future? It would be a very useful feature for many, I'm sure. For example, many contracts have trivial setters with no logic besides assigning a variable (like changing a dependent contract address) and those could be excluded from unit tests.

[fw-aaron]

Trivial setters may as well be tested. In my situatian, I have code like

function myFunc(MyEnum memory val) {
    if (val == MyEnum.one) {
        ...
    } else if (val == MyEnum.two) {
        ...
    } else {
        revert("Invalid enum value");
    }
}

As far as I can tell, there is no way to reach the revert in the else clause. I don't want to remove the revert though in case some day a new value is added, but is not explicitly supported in this function.

[emretepedev]

Any update?

[sebastiantf]

Love to have this.

A use-case is having internal function overrides required by Solidity during multiple inheritances, but not exposed with a public function.

[6str]

I have a helper contract that is used just for tests and I want it to be excluded from the coverage results.

This thread #17 states that ignoring files can be accomplished "using the /* istanbul ignore . . . */ strategy".

I've not been able to exclude the file or specific code using /* istanbul ... */ directives.

In the case of a test helper contract, it would be better if the helper contract was excluded from coverage results rather than included and showing as covered (IMO)

[6str]

maybe just adopt the existing istanbul interface for ignoring code for coverage ?

I couldn't get this to work with hardhat/solidity. It the above meaning that it should be achievable this way now, or a suggestion of a way it could be implemented?

[apecollector]

Would like this for stuff like supportsInterface and overrides of openzeppelin contracts that are required but difficult to test by themselves.

    // The following functions are overrides required by Solidity.
    function _beforeTokenTransfer(
        address operator,
        address from,
        address to,
        uint256[] memory ids,
        uint256[] memory amounts,
        bytes memory data
    ) internal override(ERC1155, ERC1155Supply) {
        super._beforeTokenTransfer(operator, from, to, ids, amounts, data);
    }

    function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId)
        public
        view
        override(ERC1155, AccessControl)
        returns (bool)
    {
        return super.supportsInterface(interfaceId);
    }

[luiztools]

I need this too!

[VGabriel45]

Any updates on this ?

[ricp]

+1, would be very useful.

[tmvolpato]

I need this too