-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
/
Copy pathscripty-vs-scriptly.html
563 lines (506 loc) · 26.6 KB
/
scripty-vs-scriptly.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge">
<title>Scripty vs Scriptly</title>
<link rel="canonical" href="https://scripty.org/scripty-vs-scriptly">
<link rel="preload" href="/assets/jb_mono/woff2/jb.woff2" as="font" type="font/woff2" crossorigin="">
<link rel="preload" href="/assets/jb_mono/woff2/jb_bold.woff2" as="font" type="font/woff2" crossorigin="">
<link rel="preload" href="/css/main.min.css" as="style" type="text/css">
<link rel="preload" href="/css/jb_mono.css" as="style" type="text/css">
<link rel="preload" href="https://a.scripty.org/count.js" as="script" type="application/javascript">
<link rel="preload" href="/js/modals.js" as="script" type="application/javascript">
<link rel="preload" href="/img/icon.svg" as="image" type="image/svg+xml">
<meta name="description" content="Check out our comparison with the only other known speech-to-text bot out there!">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<meta property="og:title" content="Scripty vs Scriptly">
<meta property="og:description" content="Check out our comparison with the only other known speech-to-text bot out there!">
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:image" content="https://scripty.org/img/icon-128.webp">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/css/main.min.css">
</head>
<body>
<div class="container is-widescreen">
<nav class="navbar is-transparent" role="navigation" aria-label="main navigation">
<div class="navbar-brand">
<a class="navbar-item" href="/"><h1>Scripty</h1></a>
<a role="button" class="navbar-burger" aria-label="menu" aria-expanded="false" data-target="main-navbar">
<span aria-hidden="true"></span>
<span aria-hidden="true"></span>
<span aria-hidden="true"></span>
</a>
</div>
<div id="main-navbar" class="navbar-menu">
<div class="navbar-start">
<a href="/invite" class="navbar-item">Invite</a>
<a href="/about" class="navbar-item">About</a>
</div>
<div class="navbar-end"></div>
</div>
</nav>
<section class="section">
<h1 class="title">Scripty vs Scriptly</h1>
<a href="https://scriptly.xyz">You can check out Scriptly here.</a>
<p>
We'll be the first to admit, we're biased. We made Scripty, so take what we say with a grain of salt.<br>
Most of the information we got about Scriptly was obtained from its site, and through some internet sleuthing,
so it may not be 100% accurate.
</p>
<p>
Note: this page was last updated August 8, 2022, so it may be out of date.
Refer directly to Scriptly and Scripty's websites for the latest up-to-date information.
</p>
</section>
<section class="section">
<h2>Details</h2>
<p>
Scripty and Scriptly happened to be named very similarly to each other by pure random chance.
Neither of us intended to be named similar to the other.<br>
If you compare the creation dates of both bots, you'll notice Scripty was created two months earlier than Scriptly,
on February 17th, 2021, whereas Scriptly was created April 10th, 2021.
</p>
</section>
<section class="section">
<h2>Features</h2>
<p>
According to Scriptly's homepage, they offer the following features:
</p>
<blockquote><i>
It provides immersive features such as voice to text transcription, text to speech vocality,
and, in the premium version, translation via voice between 2 languages.
</i></blockquote>
<p>
Their documentation offers more information on what they support, including being able to customize your text-to-speech voice.
</p>
<p>
On the other hand, at the moment, Scripty only supports speech-to-text, but plans to support text-to-speech in the future.
Translation, however, is not planned, due to the cost of running this whilst also ensuring user privacy by not sharing data with third parties.
Scripty also plans to support custom text-to-speech voices in the future.
<br>
You can refer to the table below for a tabular breakdown of the features between the two bots.
</p>
<table class="table is-transparent is-striped" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th>Scripty</th>
<th>Scriptly</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Speech-to-text</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>✅</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Text-to-speech</td>
<td>🚧</td>
<td>✅</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Translation of transcripted messages</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>🚧</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Voice assistant functionality</td>
<td>🚧</td>
<td>❌</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Voice chat moderation</td>
<td>🚧</td>
<td>❌</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Text-to-speech voice customization</td>
<td>🚧</td>
<td>✅</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Custom voice that sounds like you</td>
<td>🚧</td>
<td>❌</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section class="section">
<h2>Premium Features</h2>
<p>
According to Scriptly's homepage, they currently do <i>not</i> offer premium, but when it is released, it will include the following features:
</p>
<blockquote><i>
The premium version of the bot has many features that help improve the experience for our users.<br><br>
• Translation via voice between 2 people.<br>
• Higher quality transcription (more accurate)<br>
• More fluent TTS (text to speech)<br>
• Faster transcription<br>
• Priority support in our support server<br>
• Priority access to new features<br>
• And more!
</i></blockquote>
<p>
Scripty, on the other hand, plans to support Premium incredibly soon. In fact, by the time you read this, it's very likely already out.
Scripty's Premium does not change the quality or speed of transcriptions.
We believe everyone, regardless of their ability to pay, should experience the highest quality transcriptions we can offer them.<br>
As with last time, you can view a tabular breakdown of both bots in the table below.
</p>
<table class="table is-transparent is-striped" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="center">Scripty</th>
<th align="center">Scriptly</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Translation of voice</td>
<td>No</td>
<td>Premium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Higher quality/speed</td>
<td>Free</td>
<td>Premium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Priority Support</td>
<td>Premium</td>
<td>Premium</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Increased user limit in voice chats</td>
<td>Premium</td>
<td>Unknown</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Access to two bots</td>
<td>Premium</td>
<td>Unknown (likely no)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Custom bot for your server</td>
<td>Premium ($100/mo)</td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section class="section">
<h2>Privacy</h2>
<p>
Note that we are not Scriptly's team. We do not know for sure whether any of Scriptly's information is 100% true.
This is what we've deduced based on some internet sleuthing.
</p>
<p>
Scriptly uses <a href="https://wit.ai">Wit.Ai</a>, a free speech-to-text API made by Facebook (now Meta).<br>
Due to this API being owned by Meta, and being free, there is an <i>extremely</i> high chance Meta is using
your voice data for their own purposes, including marketing and advertising. To be completely clear,
the Scriptly team is (very likely, we can't verify as Scriptly is closed-source) not mining any of your data.
Meta is mining this data.
</p>
<button class="js-modal-trigger button is-danger" data-target="personal-opinion-modal">Personal Opinion (click to show)</button>
<p>
Scripty, on the other hand, uses <a href="https://github.com/coqui-ai/STT">Coqui STT</a>.
This is an offline speech-to-text library, meaning it runs entirely on our machines.
No data is sent to any third parties, and we do not use any of your data for any purposes.
You can independently verify this, as Scripty is open-source at <a href="https://github.com/scripty-bot/scripty">GitHub</a>.
However, due to this, Scripty is much more expensive to run, which forces us to offer expensive Premium.
</p>
<table class="table is-transparent is-striped" align="center">
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th align="center">Scripty</th>
<th align="center">Scriptly</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Sends voice to third parties</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>✅</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Third-parties use voice for own purposes</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>✅</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>All data stays on developer-controlled servers forever</td>
<td>✅</td>
<td>❌</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Developers use voice for own purposes</td>
<td>❌</td>
<td>❌</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</section>
<section class="section">
<h2>Invite</h2>
<p>
It's now up to you which bot you'd like to use. We'll offer links to both bots here.
</p>
<div class="columns">
<div class="column">
<a href="/invite" class="button is-black" data-goatcounter-click="comparison-scripty-invite">Invite Scripty</a>
</div>
<div class="column">
<a href="https://scriptly.xyz/invite" class="button is-white" data-goatcounter-click="comparison-scriptly-invite">Invite Scriptly</a>
</div>
</div>
</section>
<footer>
<hr>
made with <3 by 0/0 and valkyrie_pilot
</footer>
<div id="personal-opinion-modal" class="modal">
<div class="modal-background"></div>
<div class="modal-card">
<header class="modal-card-head">
<p class="modal-card-title">Personal Opinion</p>
<button class="delete" aria-label="close"></button>
</header>
<section class="modal-card-body">
Meta is a company well known for its privacy abuses (see links below). We can pretty much guarantee Meta is mining the data
that Scriptly sends it in the form of voice, and using it as an additional source of data on you,
which they can then sell to data brokers.<br>
I would personally not use Scriptly because of this.<br>
There are an incredible number of articles: so many, that this isn't even the tip of the iceberg.
Go search up "facebook privacy" and you'll find a long, long, long list of articles.<br>
I personally strongly recommend against giving Facebook/Meta any more of your data, which means not using Scriptly.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.vice.com/en/article/wjw889/facebook-said-it-wasnt-listening-to-your-conversations-it-was">
Vice: Aug 14, 2019: Facebook Said It Wasn't Listening to Your Conversations. It Was.
</a>
<blockquote>
Following an investigation by Bloomberg, the company admitted that it had been employing
third-party contractors to transcribe the audio messages that users exchanged on its Messenger app.
</blockquote>
<br><br>
<a href="https://eu.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2019/06/27/does-facebook-listen-to-your-conversations/1478468001/">
USAToday: June 27, 2019: Is Facebook listening to me? Why those ads appear after you talk about things
</a>
<blockquote>
“It’s like they’re stalking you,” says Court. “They put all sorts of circumstantial evidence together,
and you’re marketed to as if they’re listening to your conversations.”
</blockquote>
With Scriptly sending your conversation to Facebook for transcription, they quite literally can now listen to your conversations.
<br><br>
<a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2022/02/15/tech/facebook-internet-tracking-settlement/index.html">
CNN: Feb 15, 2022: Meta agrees to pay $90 million to settle lawsuit over Facebook tracking users' online activity
</a>
<blockquote>
Facebook-parent Meta has agreed to pay $90 million to settle a decade-old class action lawsuit over a
practice that allowed the social network to track users' activity across the internet, even if they had
logged out of the platform.
</blockquote>
And they definitely will use these transcripts and link them back to you.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7zevd/this-is-the-data-facebook-gave-police-to-prosecute-a-teenager-for-abortion">
Vice: Aug 9, 2022: This Is the Data Facebook Gave Police to Prosecute a Teenager for Abortion
</a>
<blockquote>
A 17-year-old girl and her mother have been charged with a series of felonies and misdemeanors after an
apparent medication abortion at home in Nebraska. The state’s case relies on evidence from the teenager’s
private Facebook messages, obtained directly from Facebook by court order, which show the mother and daughter
allegedly bought medication online to induce abortion, and then disposed of the body of the fetus.
</blockquote>
Which they can (and are required to) then turn over to law enforcement if requested in any criminal trials.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-media/timeline-facebook-s-privacy-issues-its-responses-n859651">
NBC News: Mar 24, 2018: A timeline of Facebook's privacy issues - and its responses
</a>
<blockquote>
In February [2018], Facebook was ordered to stop collecting private information about Belgian users on third-party
sites through the use of cookies. Facebook was also ordered to delete all data it collected illegally from
Belgians, including those who aren't Facebook users but may have still landed on a Facebook page, or risk
being fined up to 100 million euros.
</blockquote>
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2019/07/ftc-imposes-5-billion-penalty-sweeping-new-privacy-restrictions-facebook">
FTC: Jul 24, 2019: FTC Imposes $5 Billion Penalty and Sweeping New Privacy Restrictions on Facebook
</a>
<blockquote>
The $5 billion penalty against Facebook is the largest ever imposed on any company for violating consumers’
privacy and almost 20 times greater than the largest privacy or data security penalty ever imposed worldwide.
It is one of the largest penalties ever assessed by the U.S. government for any violation.
</blockquote>
<br><br>
<a href="https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/04/tech/facebook-user-info-leaked/index.html">
CNN: Apr 4, 2021: Half a billion Facebook users' information posted on hacking website, cyber experts say
</a>
<blockquote>
The personal information of about half a billion Facebook users, including their phone numbers,
have been posted to a website used by hackers, cybersecurity experts say.
</blockquote>
And you definitely can't trust Facebook with the security of your data either. This isn't the first time, and
won't be the last.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/news/252462588/A-recent-history-of-Facebook-security-and-privacy-issues">
TechTarget: Apr 30, 2019: A recent history of Facebook security and privacy issues
</a>
<blockquote>
Starting 2019, Facebook was caught in January exploiting a loophole in Apple's iOS policies and distributing
a research app using an enterprise certificate. With this type of certificate, the app was able to gain
root access to a user's device and gather information, such as constant location tracking and messages and
media from third-party apps.
</blockquote>
They'll go to any length required to get your data. When Apple noticed what they did here, they banned this
certificate entirely, causing internal builds of Facebook to break.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.techtarget.com/searchsecurity/news/252460110/Hundreds-of-millions-of-Facebook-passwords-exposed-internally">
TechTarget: Mar 22, 2019: Hundreds of millions of Facebook passwords exposed internally
</a>
<blockquote>
Hundreds of millions of Facebook passwords were exposed within the company, sparking a debate among infosec
experts over whether it was a simple mistake or an example of bad-faith actions by the company.<br>
Facebook Thursday admitted that hundreds of millions of user passwords were stored in plaintext within the company's network.
</blockquote>
You <i>definitely</i> can't trust Facebook with security.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252461090/Third-party-Facebook-apps-expose-540-million-users-details">
Computer Weekly: Apr 04, 2019: Third-party Facebook apps expose 540 million users' details
</a>
<!--suppress SpellCheckingInspection -->
<blockquote>
A year after the Cambridge Analytica data sharing scandal, researchers have discovered publicly exposed data
stores belonging to two more third-party developed Facebook apps.<br>
The cyber risk team at security firm UpGuard found one data store originating from the Mexico-based media
company Cultura Colectiva of 146GB, containing more than 540 million records, detailing comments, likes,
reactions, account names, Facebook IDs and more.
</blockquote>
<br><br>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Privacy_concerns_with_Facebook">
Wikipedia: Privacy concerns with Facebook
</a>
<br><br>
<a href="https://twitter.com/cherthedev/status/1485679843282878464">
Twitter: @cherthedev: Facial recognition software is terrifying, honestly.
</a>
<!--suppress SpellCheckingInspection -->
<blockquote>
@Meta /Facebook auto-tagged this woman as me on someone else’s photo dump.<br>
Turns out she’s my great-great-great grandmother, Maria Schäfer, who immigrated to the US from Russia in 1899.
</blockquote>
And they have the algorithmic power to link your voice to you.
All it takes is a tiny bit of training data, which they have.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/2/22759613/meta-facebook-face-recognition-automatic-tagging-feature-shutdown">
The Verge: Nov 2, 2021: Facebook is shutting down its Face Recognition tagging program
</a>
<blockquote>
Pesenti says more than one-third of Facebook’s daily active users had opted into Face Recognition scanning,
and over a billion face recognition profiles will be deleted as part of the upcoming change.
</blockquote>
They had a billion plus people stored in their facial recognition system. Given Facebook also gets videos,
with human speech uploaded, it is not a stretch to assume they can very easily do the same with your voice.
<br><br>
<a href="https://text.npr.org/986005820">
NPR: Apr 9, 2021: After Data Breach Exposes 530 Million, Facebook Says It Will Not Notify Users
</a>
<blockquote>
Facebook decided not to notify over 530 million of its users whose personal data was lifted in a breach
sometime before August 2019 and was recently made available in a public database. Facebook also has no plans
to do so, a spokesperson said.<br>
Phone numbers, full names, locations, some email addresses, and other details from user profiles were posted
to an amateur hacking forum on Saturday, Business Insider reported last week.
</blockquote>
<br><br>
<a href="https://gizmodo.com/facebook-knows-how-to-track-you-using-the-dust-on-your-1821030620">
Gizmodo: Jan 11, 2018: Facebook Knows How to Track You Using the Dust on Your Camera Lens
</a>
<blockquote>
Patents filed by Facebook that mention People You May Know show some ingenious methods that Facebook has
devised for figuring out that seeming strangers on the network might know each other. One filed in 2015
describes a technique that would connect two people through the camera metadata associated with the photos
they uploaded. It might assume two people knew each other if the images they uploaded looked like they were
titled in the same series of photos—IMG_4605739.jpg and IMG_4605742, for example—or if lens scratches or dust
were detectable in the same spots on the photos, revealing the photos were taken by the same camera.
</blockquote>
Hell, if they can track you using <i>camera lens dust</i>, they're more than capable of doing the same with your voice.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.theverge.com/2021/2/27/22304618/judge-approves-facebook-privacy-settlement-illinois-facial-recognition">
The Verge: Feb 27, 2021: Judge approves $650 million Facebook privacy settlement over facial recognition feature
</a>
<blockquote>
Chicago attorney Jay Edelson sued Facebook in Cook County Circuit Court back in 2015, alleging that the
platform’s use of facial recognition tagging was not allowed under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy
Act. The lawsuit claimed that Facebook’s Tag Suggestions tool, which scanned faces in users’ photos and
offered suggestions about who the person might be, stored biometric data without users’ consent in violation
of the Illinois law.
</blockquote>
And they will do it.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/02/15/texas-lawsuit-facebook-meta-privacy-facial-recognition/">
Washington Post: Feb 15, 2022: Texas sues Facebook parent Meta over use of facial recognition, alleging privacy violations
</a>
<blockquote>
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) on Monday sued Facebook’s parent company, Meta Platforms Inc.,
alleging that the social media giant for years collected Texans’ biometric data without their full consent,
in violation of state privacy laws.<br>
Paxton’s lawsuit, filed in district court in Harrison County, alleges that Facebook collected users’
biometric identifiers from photos and videos without properly informing them, shared the data with third
parties and failed to delete it in a timely way, from about 2010 to late 2021 — when Meta announced it would
shut down Facebook’s facial recognition system and delete the data it collected on more than 1 billion people.
</blockquote>
As lawsuit after lawsuit shows.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn27761-facebook-can-recognise-you-in-photos-even-if-youre-not-looking/">
NewScientist: Jun 22, 2015: Facebook can recognise you in photos even if you're not looking
</a>
<blockquote>
An experimental algorithm out of Facebook’s artificial intelligence lab can recognise people in photographs
even when it can’t see their faces. Instead it looks for other unique characteristics like your hairdo,
clothing, body shape and pose.
</blockquote>
Not looking? We can figure out who you are.
<br><br>
<a href="https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Famp%2Farticles%2Ffacebook-really-is-spying-on-you-just-not-through-your-phones-mic-1520448644">
Wall Street Journal: Mar 7, 2018: Facebook Really Is Spying on You, Just Not Through Your Phone’s Mic (proxied via 12ft.io for paywall bypass)
</a>
Care for more spying and tracking?
<br><br>
<a href="https://gizmodo.com/facebook-figured-out-my-family-secrets-and-it-wont-tel-1797696163">
Gizmodo: Aug 25, 2018: Facebook Figured Out My Family Secrets, And It Won't Tell Me How
</a>
<blockquote>
Rebecca Porter, we discovered, is my great aunt, by marriage. She is married to my biological grandfather’s
brother; she met him 35 years ago, the year after I was born. Facebook knew my family tree better than I did.
</blockquote>
Hey, if it can figure out your family tree, when everyone between you and this other person doesn't use
Facebook at all, it sure as hell can figure out who you are from your voice.
<br><br>
<a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/2018/09/26/exclusive-whatsapp-cofounder-brian-acton-gives-the-inside-story-on-deletefacebook-and-why-he-left-850-million-behind/#66a1adc63f20">
Forbes: Sep 26, 2018: Exclusive: WhatsApp Cofounder Brian Acton Gives The Inside Story On #DeleteFacebook And Why He Left $850 Million Behind
</a>
<blockquote>
If walking away from $850 million feels like penance, Acton has gone further. He has supercharged a small
messaging app, Signal, run by a security researcher named Moxie Marlinspike with a mission to put users
before profit, giving it $50 million and turning it into a foundation. Now he’s working with the same people
who built the opensource encryption protocol that is part of Signal and protects WhatsApp’s 1.5 billion users
and that also sits as an option on Facebook Messenger, Microsoft’s Skype and Google’s Allo messenger.
Essentially, he’s re-creating WhatsApp in the pure, idealized form it started: free messages and calls,
with end-to-end encryption and no obligations to ad platforms.
</blockquote>
Walking away from nearly $1 billion over Facebook's severe lack of privacy should say something.
<br><br>
</section>
<footer class="modal-card-foot">
<button class="button">Close</button>
</footer>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<!-- 100% privacy friendly analytics: https://a.scripty.org/ -->
<script async defer data-goatcounter="https://a.scripty.org/count" src="https://a.scripty.org/count.js"></script>
<script async defer src="/js/modals.js"></script>
</body>
</html>