Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the question of Nan #13

Open
qiqiing opened this issue May 16, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

the question of Nan #13

qiqiing opened this issue May 16, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@qiqiing
Copy link

qiqiing commented May 16, 2021

Hello, I used your graph construction, graph aggregation module and my own data for training. During the training process, I found that increasing the size of the input data will cause Loss to appear'Nan'. At this time, if the batchsize is set to 1, loss will become normal. I can guarantee that my input data is correct and does not contain the ‘Nan’ value. So what is the reason for this situation, is it because the backpropagation of the imtopatch operation may cause the gradient to explode? Is there any solution?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant