-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 cipher suite inconsistent scoring #28
Comments
I think it might be because the first site doesn't have an EV cert, but shouldn't that affect only the primary site score and not the score of the individual cipher suites? |
I've not been using this addon long, but as I understand it the scores shown in the images above relate to the bold domain's overall score and just happen to be positioned near to the cipher suite the domain uses. |
That would explain it. In that case, perhaps that score should be moved to the left of the domain name instead of the cipher suite, and a separate score added specifically to reflect the quality of the cipher suite in use. |
@welwood08 is right. The scores are the overall ratings, and not just for the ciphersuite. The ratings also include EV-cert, Firefox connection status etc (which is inherited from the top domain). |
Thanks for the clarification. |
Since firefox already gives great feedback on Bad connection or on an invalid certificate, I have found these settings to work great and provide the type of discrimination I'm looking for: Also, leaving the Cipher suite scoring at defaults. If you visit a site with no forward secrecy, you will notice. If you visit a site with non-sha2 certificate, you will notice. |
Excellent add-on, found one problem, this one cipher suite is scored 9.0 on some sites (example weakdh.org) and 10.0 on others (example usaa.com.) Is there a difference I'm not seeing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: