You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
when looking to the manual of pyFai I tripped over the polarization
correction that is implemented. Apparently, you are still using only a
single parameter P, and I do not understand the physical meaning of it:
vertical (-1) and horizontal (+1)? What are you doing when the elliptical
polarization axis is inclined by 35.55 degrees, e.g. because something
rotates the polarization direction (e.g. with a type of quarter wave
plate).
I personally separate the polarization correction into an unpolarized
(1-P) and a polarized contribution (P) based on Stokes parameters and then
I describe the polarized part in the Poincare notation (ellipticity pchi
and polarization angle ppsi). The final formulas are not complicated and
the three input parameters have a physical meaning.
Somebody could say that we cannot distinguish between, circular and
unpolarized light because we only measure intensities, not amplitudes. But
remember, that we already used to have colleagues that claimed that in
SAXS scattering angles are always so small that no conversion of tan to
sin would be necessary. For me the pyFAI parameter P seems to be a bad
trick that makes the polarization correction more difficult especially in
the case of partially rotated polarization planes that even does not seem
to be possible in pyFAI.
You can find a description in the optics book of Born & Wolf
[1] Born&Wolf, Principles of Optics, 6th (corrected) edition 1997,
Cambridge University Press 1980, 10.8 and 1.4.
I prefer a general description that covers all possible (future) cases,
especially then, when its implementation is simple.
Greetings,
Peter
PS: I have written a documentation in the module polarization.c (in
spd/edfpack):
The Stokes parameter of the incident wave can be separated into an unpolarized
s(1) and a polarized part s(2):
(xii a) s = s(1) + s(2) = ( s0, s1, s2, s3 )
(xii b) s(1) = ( (1-P)_s0, 0, 0, 0 )
(xii c) s(2) = ( P_s0, s1, s2, s3 )
where P is the polarization (0<=P<=1). If P is 0 the wave is totally
unpolarized, if P is 1 the wave is totally polarized.
The polarized portion s(2) can be described by the Poincar notation:
(xiii a) s0(2)+s1(2) = P_so+s1 = P_so_(1+cos(2_PChi)cos(2_PPsi))
(xiii b) s0(2)-s1(2) = P_so-s1 = P_so(1-cos(2_PChi)_cos(2_PPsi))
(xiii c) s2(2) = s2 = P_so_cos(2_PChi)_sin(2*PPsi)
with
P : degree of polarization (0<=P<=1)
PChi : ellipticity (after Poincar) (-pi/4<=PChi<=+pi/4)
PChi=-pi/4 left hand (cw) circular polarization
PChi<0 left hand polarization
PChi==0 linear polarization
PChi>0 right hand polarization
PChi=pi/4 right hand (ccw) circular polarization
PPsi : inclination of the plane of polarization (after Poincar)
(0<=PPsi<pi)
PPsi is the angle between axis x_1 and the plane of polarization
Because the angles PChi and PPsi are defined in a mirrored coordinate
system
with the incident beam parallel to e3^ (and not antiparallel) the signs of
the
angle PPsi must be altered if used in the standard SAXS coordinate system.
The
result is independent of the sign of PChi.
The scattering intensity Iout can also be splitted into an unpolarized and
a polarized part:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: