Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] Add untransmutable EMC to ores and in general #1478

Closed
jawsawn opened this issue Feb 11, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

[Suggestion] Add untransmutable EMC to ores and in general #1478

jawsawn opened this issue Feb 11, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@jawsawn
Copy link

jawsawn commented Feb 11, 2017

1.7.10 EE3 has a really great ability. Now I understand how important it was. Basicaly I suggest the unlearnable emc to some stuff. Like ores for example. Iron ore does not have emc because it means easy dupe bug with a pulverizer. My suggestion is that ores have the equal emc as their ingots. This means 1 iron ore has 256 emc. And you can put it in your transmutation table to get the emc. BUT YOU CANNOT TRANSMITE THE BLOCK ITSELF. This fixes so many dupe bugs and eases the ProjectE mining.
Also add support for the custom emc for this.

~~Sincerely from Skyexchange Developer Jason.

@sinkillerj
Copy link
Owner

Inequivalent exchange will come eventually and this feature will likely be part of it. That being said I dont have a estimate on when ill have time for the overhaul,

@MaPePeR
Copy link
Contributor

MaPePeR commented Feb 12, 2017

If you now support the idea of separate buy/sell values for emc i could try to update my PR from 2015.

@sinkillerj
Copy link
Owner

@MaPePeR I've made my thoughts clear on split values multiple times, its a overcomplicated system.

@MaPePeR
Copy link
Contributor

MaPePeR commented Feb 12, 2017

To me it looked like you changed your mind. Because

Inequivalent exchange will come eventually and this feature will likely be part of it.

and inequivalent exchange + "this feature" is separate buy/sell.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants