You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Documentation is dramatically important regarding the prolonging the lifetime of any projects. Understanding what a project does, where its limited, and how to use it is imperative for contributers and users.
Requirements - Not Limited to but must include the following
At the minimum follow Socrata README Standards
Why use Eurybates instead of ActiveMQ directly?
A Wiki describing issues like Architecture, Design Decisions, Why we wrote this...
A Roadmap of where the project is going.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mhotan
changed the title
Documentation ... do it... do it
Documentation ... do it ... do it
Oct 28, 2015
My main question about this project: what does it provide that's better than directly using an ActiveMQ or Kafka library to push or listen to events? I think the README's main goal should be to answer that question.
For instance, the readme mentions that Eurybates imposes "some interesting requirements and design decisions", but only lists one: that it "automatically commits offsets every 10 seconds". What is the benefit of this decision? What are the other design decisions and requirements, and what are their benefits? It would be great if the readme listed these design decisions, and the pros and cons for each one.
Background
Documentation is dramatically important regarding the prolonging the lifetime of any projects. Understanding what a project does, where its limited, and how to use it is imperative for contributers and users.
Requirements - Not Limited to but must include the following
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: