Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: 🤔 search options with keyboard in sd-select #1167

Open
9 tasks
karlbaumhauer opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
9 tasks

fix: 🤔 search options with keyboard in sd-select #1167

karlbaumhauer opened this issue Jun 25, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
🔧 code needs changes in code Subtask Epic subtasks

Comments

@karlbaumhauer
Copy link
Contributor

karlbaumhauer commented Jun 25, 2024

Subtask from ticket: solid-design-system/internal#78

Current behavior

Options are not always searchable with keyboard when select is open.

Expected behavior

Users can search in the list of otions using the keyboard.

Steps to reproduce

Chapter 3 in the file "Test Results"

Technical Information

DoR

  • Item has business value
  • Item has been estimated by the team
  • Item is clear and well-defined
  • Item dependencies have been identified

DoD

  • Documentation has been created/updated (if applicable)
  • Migration Guide has been created/updated (if applicable)
  • Relevant E2E tests (Features, A11y, Bug fixes) are created/updated
  • Relevant stories (Features, A11y) are created/updated
  • Implementation works successfully on feature branch
@karlbaumhauer karlbaumhauer added the 🔧 code needs changes in code label Jun 25, 2024
@karlbaumhauer karlbaumhauer moved this to 🛠️ To be pre-refined in Solid Design System Project Board Jun 25, 2024
@karlbaumhauer karlbaumhauer added the Subtask Epic subtasks label Jun 25, 2024
@coraliefeil
Copy link
Contributor

@karlbaumhauer could this be closed when handled within #1486 ?

@karlbaumhauer
Copy link
Contributor Author

@karlbaumhauer could this be closed when handled within #1486 ?

@coraliefeil it could but from what I read in #1486, it does not contain the issue mentioned. Maybe I am getting something wrong (@smfonseca / @mariohamann ?) but if not, I would like to keep this in a separate ticket.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🔧 code needs changes in code Subtask Epic subtasks
Projects
Status: 🛠️ To be pre-refined
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants