Best Practice 'Add On Library' >>Create additional 'Extension Library' for Spectre.Console? #784
Unanswered
jeffward01
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
@jeffward01 there is no best practice currently.
Yes.
No. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
The Spectre.Console name should be reserved for official packages, so we
have been recommending something like "Unofficial.Spectre.Console" for the
name. But truth be told, I'm not sure anyone has gone down this route yet.
…On Fri, Aug 26, 2022, 5:00 AM Nils Andresen ***@***.***> wrote:
@jeffward01 <https://github.com/jeffward01> there is no best practice
currently.
Can I just create my own repo, and push it myself to nuget and Github?
Yes.
... or is there a preferred method of doing this?
No.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#784 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AASVPYZSKRDKWJWRJE7T23TV3CBRRANCNFSM5SJW2P2A>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: <spectreconsole/spectre.console/repo-discussions/784/comments/3481602@
github.com>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello all!
I was wondering what is the best practice, or methods to create a Spectre.Console 'add-on' library.
Concept
My idea is I would like to create a library called:
Spectre.Console.FigletFonts
Essentially the library will be a wrapper around FigletFonts and allow users to easily add new Figlet fonts. In the same way that Emojis, or Spinners can be 'referenced', these Figlets Fonts will be referenced in the same manner.
Question
Can I just create my own repo, and push it myself to nuget and Github? or is there a preferred method of doing this?
Thanks!
Note: this can also be added to the 'Idea' topic category
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions