TypeRegistrar and TypeResolver should be included

[Lasamat]

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I looked at the documentation and examples for using Dependancy Injection with this library and both the example for Logging and DI use the exact same two wrapper classes to convert from Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection to use with this Library.

Describe the solution you'd like
I would like to have either those two classes already in the Library or a way to simply pass the ServiceCollection in the first place.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternative would be to copy paste those two exact same classes for all my DI Console Apps...

[nils-a]

@Lasamat They are not included to not "push" users of Spectre.Console into using one or the other DI framework. The TypeRegistrar and TypeResolver have been specifically implemented to be independent of specific DI frameworks.

The code you referred to is one possible implementation, the Cake project, for example, uses another.
I, myself, do like SimpleInjector and don't use the Microsoft DI Extensions very often. In my projects, I use the Spectre.Console.Registrars.SimpleInjector NuGet package to not always copy-paste the same code.

[Lasamat]

@nils-a Thank you for the fast response. I'm relatively new to collab on Open Source and proper software architecture.

The SimpleInjector looks nice. If its okay I would like to PR it into the Spectre.Console.Cli -> CommandApp -> DI section of the documentation.

[nils-a]

Sure, good idea.

[hughesjs]

Might I suggest an alternative of including them in a Spectre.Cli.DependencyInjection.Microsoft package or something of that ilk?