You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If we call extract with a URL which contains a query parameter that is not included in the list of allowed query parameters, the behaviour depends on whether the allowed parameters are provided or not.
Look particularly at the third and fourth line, it seems like such a match should either be rejected outright or should result in page being set correctly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's also inconsistent between matching a query parameter, which makes the extraction match any query parameter, and not matching a query parameter in which case we can't provide any query parameters at all.
Suppose we have a template like this:
If we call
extract
with a URL which contains a query parameter that is not included in the list of allowed query parameters, the behaviour depends on whether the allowed parameters are provided or not.In any of the above extractions,
foo
should not be present in the result.It gets even stranger when we add a splat into the mix:
This results in extractions like this:
Look particularly at the third and fourth line, it seems like such a match should either be rejected outright or should result in
page
being set correctly.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: