Replies: 4 comments
-
Bump @Superpat |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Have you |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
The proposal seems sensible to me. I don't really have time to hash it out this month. Improving the inspector is my main concern right now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I’ve created #293 for further discussion. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
So html form's are kind of made redundant by two way bindings and data-on-*, but we dont want to lose the variable naming with
name
or html validation likerequired
. Some api's that may be used by the backends might also expect formdata and we dont necessarily want to have to retranslate files from base64 into formdata just to transfer them.Would create the following store:
I'll sleep on this proposal.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions