Decide where to define "status"

[peterdesmet]

As noticed in #153, we will remove dwc_attributes.rdf: https://github.com/tdwg/dwc/blob/64311240eeb15c0016c858846f9adbfb91bd515d/terms/dwc_attributes.rdf. It defines status, decision, abcdEquivalence , and organizedInClass. The last two have been moved out of the standard, but the status and maybe decision(see #164) need to be defined somewhere. Where do we want keep this? @baskaufs @tucotuco

[baskaufs]

I opened an issue on the TAG tracker about this several days ago: tdwg/tag#13 but haven't gotten any comments about it yet. I feel as though these properties should apply TDWG-wide and therefore should not be part of DwC per se. The Documentation Spec has already coopted this namespace to define two new terms that aren't specifically about DwC.

[peterdesmet]

OK, let's close this issue once it's picked up there.

[baskaufs]

Comment about decision in #164

[peterdesmet]

@baskaufs can this be closed?

[baskaufs]

I think we can close this. All of the tdwgutility: terms (rebranded to be TDWG-wide) can be viewed here:
https://github.com/tdwg/rs.tdwg.org/blob/master/utility/utility.csv . So I think this is no longer DwC's problem.