We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use case:
Feature:
ie:
# Default and current behavior eval "$(tome init my-commands --include=all ~/my-scripts bash)" # New extension eval "$(tome init my-commands --include=executables ~/my-scripts bash)"
@toumorokoshi Is this something you'd accept as a patch under the design conditions of "does not break default backwards compatibility"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ok, I've been thinking about this and I prototyped a simpler solution that those implicit behaviors as follows:
I think it's a more elegant approach that solves the following usability issues:
If you also like this approach and want it contributed back, let me know 👍
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hey! thanks for the suggestion.
If there's a strong need for custom ignoring of files - I think a gitignore-style file with glob matches makes sense. And happy to accept a PR!
FYI all scripts and files with a leading dot are ignored today. Does that not work for your use case?
No branches or pull requests
Use case:
Feature:
ie:
@toumorokoshi Is this something you'd accept as a patch under the design conditions of "does not break default backwards compatibility"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: