You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 29, 2023. It is now read-only.
I think this place's result should be 2.8284271247461903
By the way, I think it might be better that uses the angle rather than radian in the result of the angle
To be honest,I even think the result is wrong, when I saw the result first and was not aware of that the result uses the radian, which does not fix someone's direct congnition. Or, can use the comment says that the result uses the radian to calculate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
I think this place's result should be 2.8284271247461903
By the way, I think it might be better that uses the angle rather than radian in the result of the angle
To be honest,I even think the result is wrong, when I saw the result first and was not aware of that the result uses the radian, which does not fix someone's direct congnition. Or, can use the comment says that the result uses the radian to calculate.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: