Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Usage]: When running models on multiple GPUs, workload does not get split #12354

Open
1 task done
ArturDev42 opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
1 task done
Labels
usage How to use vllm

Comments

@ArturDev42
Copy link

ArturDev42 commented Jan 23, 2025

Your current environment

PyTorch version: 2.5.1+cu124
Is debug build: False
CUDA used to build PyTorch: 12.4
ROCM used to build PyTorch: N/A

OS: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS (x86_64)
GCC version: (Ubuntu 11.4.0-1ubuntu1~22.04) 11.4.0
Clang version: Could not collect
CMake version: Could not collect
Libc version: glibc-2.35

Python version: 3.11.6 (main, Nov 2 2023, 09:27:30) [GCC 11.4.0] (64-bit runtime)
Python platform: Linux-5.15.0-119-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
Is CUDA available: True
CUDA runtime version: Could not collect
CUDA_MODULE_LOADING set to: LAZY
GPU models and configuration:
GPU 0: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 3: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

Nvidia driver version: 560.35.03
cuDNN version: Could not collect
HIP runtime version: N/A
MIOpen runtime version: N/A
Is XNNPACK available: True

CPU:
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Address sizes: 43 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 128
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-127
Vendor ID: AuthenticAMD
Model name: AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-Cores
CPU family: 23
Model: 49
Thread(s) per core: 2
Core(s) per socket: 64
Socket(s): 1
Stepping: 0
Frequency boost: enabled
CPU max MHz: 4308.3979
CPU min MHz: 2200.0000
BogoMIPS: 5389.92
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc cpuid extd_apicid aperfmperf rapl pni pclmulqdq monitor ssse3 fma cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 movbe popcnt aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit wdt tce topoext perfctr_core perfctr_nb bpext perfctr_llc mwaitx cpb cat_l3 cdp_l3 hw_pstate ssbd mba ibpb stibp vmmcall fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 cqm rdt_a rdseed adx smap clflushopt clwb sha_ni xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 cqm_llc cqm_occup_llc cqm_mbm_total cqm_mbm_local clzero irperf xsaveerptr rdpru wbnoinvd amd_ppin arat npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save tsc_scale vmcb_clean flushbyasid decodeassists pausefilter pfthreshold avic v_vmsave_vmload vgif v_spec_ctrl umip rdpid overflow_recov succor smca sme sev sev_es
Virtualization: AMD-V
L1d cache: 2 MiB (64 instances)
L1i cache: 2 MiB (64 instances)
L2 cache: 32 MiB (64 instances)
L3 cache: 256 MiB (16 instances)
NUMA node(s): 1
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0-127
Vulnerability Gather data sampling: Not affected
Vulnerability Itlb multihit: Not affected
Vulnerability L1tf: Not affected
Vulnerability Mds: Not affected
Vulnerability Meltdown: Not affected
Vulnerability Mmio stale data: Not affected
Vulnerability Reg file data sampling: Not affected
Vulnerability Retbleed: Mitigation; untrained return thunk; SMT enabled with STIBP protection
Vulnerability Spec rstack overflow: Mitigation; safe RET
Vulnerability Spec store bypass: Mitigation; Speculative Store Bypass disabled via prctl and seccomp
Vulnerability Spectre v1: Mitigation; usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization
Vulnerability Spectre v2: Mitigation; Retpolines; IBPB conditional; STIBP always-on; RSB filling; PBRSB-eIBRS Not affected; BHI Not affected
Vulnerability Srbds: Not affected
Vulnerability Tsx async abort: Not affected

Versions of relevant libraries:
[pip3] numpy==1.26.4
[pip3] nvidia-cublas-cu12==12.4.5.8
[pip3] nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12==12.4.127
[pip3] nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12==12.4.127
[pip3] nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12==12.4.127
[pip3] nvidia-cudnn-cu12==9.1.0.70
[pip3] nvidia-cufft-cu12==11.2.1.3
[pip3] nvidia-curand-cu12==10.3.5.147
[pip3] nvidia-cusolver-cu12==11.6.1.9
[pip3] nvidia-cusparse-cu12==12.3.1.170
[pip3] nvidia-ml-py==12.560.30
[pip3] nvidia-nccl-cu12==2.21.5
[pip3] nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12==12.4.127
[pip3] nvidia-nvtx-cu12==12.4.127
[pip3] pyzmq==26.2.0
[pip3] torch==2.5.1
[pip3] torchvision==0.20.1
[pip3] transformers==4.48.1
[pip3] triton==3.1.0
[conda] Could not collect
ROCM Version: Could not collect
Neuron SDK Version: N/A
vLLM Version: 0.6.6.post1
vLLM Build Flags:
CUDA Archs: Not Set; ROCm: Disabled; Neuron: Disabled
GPU Topology:
GPU0 GPU1 GPU2 GPU3 CPU Affinity NUMA Affinity GPU NUMA ID
GPU0 X NODE NODE NODE 0-127 0 N/A
GPU1 NODE X NODE NODE 0-127 0 N/A
GPU2 NODE NODE X NV4 0-127 0 N/A
GPU3 NODE NODE NV4 X 0-127 0 N/A

Legend:

X = Self
SYS = Connection traversing PCIe as well as the SMP interconnect between NUMA nodes (e.g., QPI/UPI)
NODE = Connection traversing PCIe as well as the interconnect between PCIe Host Bridges within a NUMA node
PHB = Connection traversing PCIe as well as a PCIe Host Bridge (typically the CPU)
PXB = Connection traversing multiple PCIe bridges (without traversing the PCIe Host Bridge)
PIX = Connection traversing at most a single PCIe bridge
NV# = Connection traversing a bonded set of # NVLinks

LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/csem/divr/users/adx/env/lib/python3.11/site-packages/cv2/../../lib64:/local/user/toolsr64/linux64_u22/usr/local/lib:/opt/ibm/lsf/10.1/linux3.10-glibc2.17-x86_64/lib:/opt/tools/linux64_u22/usr/local/lib:
CUDA_MODULE_LOADING=LAZY

How would you like to use vllm

I want to run a model on multiple GPUs. From the documentation I understand that the --tensor-parallel-size flag needs to be set. I am running the following command:

vllm serve meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct \
    --enable-auto-tool-choice \
    --tool-call-parser llama3_json \
    --chat-template src/vllm_chat_templates/tool_chat_template_llama3.1_json.jinja \
    --max_model_len 5000 \
    --tensor-parallel-size 4

I am seeing that the workload is not split on 4 GPUs. The utilization in case of using only one GPU is replicated on all 4 GPUs when using --tensor-parallel-size 4. Am I using the framework wrong? I have a large model that requires multiple GPUs to run and expect the workload to be split across multiple GPUs.

Before submitting a new issue...

  • Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and asked the chatbot living at the bottom right corner of the documentation page, which can answer lots of frequently asked questions.
@ArturDev42 ArturDev42 added the usage How to use vllm label Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
usage How to use vllm
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant