diff --git a/index.html b/index.html
index 8e7d81a3..41412628 100644
--- a/index.html
+++ b/index.html
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
   <link href="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2021/cg-draft" rel="stylesheet">
   <meta content="Bikeshed version 82ce88815, updated Thu Sep 7 16:33:55 2023 -0700" name="generator">
   <link href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/" rel="canonical">
-  <meta content="fe0320bc0e0049d40f544e02d87bec6ba4dcee13" name="document-revision">
+  <meta content="dcd212d3cc2dbb3972b4c68deb730117513d0feb" name="document-revision">
 <style>
 .about { margin-left: 3em; margin-right: 3em; font-size: .83em}
 table { margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto }
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@
   <div class="head">
    <p data-fill-with="logo"><a class="logo" href="https://www.w3.org/"> <img alt="W3C" height="48" src="https://www.w3.org/StyleSheets/TR/2021/logos/W3C" width="72"> </a> </p>
    <h1 class="p-name no-ref" id="title">W3C Process Document</h1>
-   <p id="w3c-state"><a href="https://www.w3.org/standards/types#CG-DRAFT">Draft Community Group Report</a>, <time class="dt-updated" datetime="2023-11-08">8 November 2023</time></p>
+   <p id="w3c-state"><a href="https://www.w3.org/standards/types#CG-DRAFT">Draft Community Group Report</a>, <time class="dt-updated" datetime="2023-12-07">7 December 2023</time></p>
    <details open>
     <summary>More details about this document</summary>
     <div data-fill-with="spec-metadata">
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ <h1 class="p-name no-ref" id="title">W3C Process Document</h1>
     </div>
    </details>
    <div data-fill-with="warning"></div>
-   <p class="copyright" data-fill-with="copyright"><a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Copyright">Copyright</a> © 2023 <a href="https://www.w3.org/">World Wide Web Consortium</a>. <abbr title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</abbr><sup>®</sup> <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#Legal_Disclaimer">liability</a>, <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/ipr-notice#W3C_Trademarks">trademark</a> and <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software" rel="license" title="W3C Software and Document License">permissive document license</a> rules apply. </p>
+   <p class="copyright" data-fill-with="copyright"><a href="https://www.w3.org/policies/#copyright">Copyright</a> © 2023 <a href="https://www.w3.org/">World Wide Web Consortium</a>. <abbr title="World Wide Web Consortium">W3C</abbr><sup>®</sup> <a href="https://www.w3.org/policies/#Legal_Disclaimer">liability</a>, <a href="https://www.w3.org/policies/#W3C_Trademarks">trademark</a> and <a href="https://www.w3.org/copyright/software-license/" rel="license" title="W3C Software and Document License">permissive document license</a> rules apply. </p>
    <hr title="Separator for header">
   </div>
   <div class="p-summary" data-fill-with="abstract">
@@ -606,7 +606,7 @@ <h2 class="no-num no-toc no-ref heading settled" id="sotd"><span class="content"
 	follows the <a href="https://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/">most recent operative Process Document</a> announced to the Membership. </p>
    <p> This document is developed by the Advisory Board’s Process Task Force
 	working within the <a href="https://www.w3.org/community/w3process/">W3C Process Community Group</a> (which anyone can join).
-	This is the 8 November 2023 Draft Community Group Report for the proposed next version of the W3C Process Document. </p>
+	This is the 7 December 2023 Draft Community Group Report for the proposed next version of the W3C Process Document. </p>
    <p>This document,
 
 which is based on the <a href="https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20231103/">3 November 2023 Process</a>,
@@ -2155,7 +2155,7 @@ <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="5.1" id="decision-types"><span class="se
     <p>In contrast,
 	a <dfn class="dfn-paneled" data-dfn-type="dfn" data-noexport id="def-w3c-decision">W3C decision</dfn> is
 	determined by the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team④⑥">Team</a> on behalf of the W3C community
-	by assessing the consensus of the W3C Community after an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review②">Advisory Committee review</a>.</p>
+	by <a href="#ACReviewAfter">assessing the consensus of the W3C Community</a> after an <a href="#ACReview">Advisory Committee review</a>.</p>
     <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="5.2" id="consensus-building"><span class="secno">5.2. </span><span class="content"> Consensus Building</span><a class="self-link" href="#consensus-building"></a></h3>
     <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="5.2.1" id="Consensus"><span class="secno">5.2.1. </span><span class="content"> Consensus</span><a class="self-link" href="#Consensus"></a></h4>
     <p>Consensus is a core value of W3C.
@@ -2191,7 +2191,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="5.2.1" id="Consensus"><span class="secno
     </dl>
     <p class="note" role="note"><span class="marker">Note:</span> A <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection④">Formal Objection</a> always indicates a sustained objection,
 	but isn’t necessary to express it
-	(except in the context of formal <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review③">AC Reviews</a>).
+	(except in the context of formal <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review②">AC Reviews</a>).
 	Disagreement with a proposed decision,
 	however, does not always rise to the level of sustained objection,
 	as individuals could be willing to accept a decision
@@ -2361,7 +2361,7 @@ <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="5.5" id="registering-objections"><span c
 	likewise, a record of each <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection①①">Formal Objection</a> against a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#Member-only" id="ref-for-Member-only①">Member-visible</a> decision <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be made <a href="#confidentiality-change">available to Members</a>.
 	A Call for Review to the Advisory Committee <em class="rfc2119">must</em> identify any <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection①②">Formal Objections</a> related to that review.</p>
     <p class="note" role="note"><span class="marker">Note:</span> <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection①③">Formal Objections</a> against matter in a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#technical-report" id="ref-for-technical-report①">technical report</a> are required to be addressed before <a href="#rec-advance">requesting advancement</a> of the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#technical-report" id="ref-for-technical-report②">technical report</a>.</p>
-    <p>A <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection①④">Formal Objection</a> filed during an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review④">Advisory Committee Review</a> is considered registered at the close of the review period.</p>
+    <p>A <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection①④">Formal Objection</a> filed during an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review③">Advisory Committee Review</a> is considered registered at the close of the review period.</p>
     <p>Registering a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection①⑤">Formal Objection</a> initiates the process of <a href="#addressing-fo">addressing the Formal Objection</a>.</p>
     <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="5.6" id="addressing-fo"><span class="secno">5.6. </span><span class="content"> Addressing Formal Objections</span><a class="self-link" href="#addressing-fo"></a></h3>
     <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="5.6.1" id="team-fo-mediation"><span class="secno">5.6.1. </span><span class="content"> Investigation and Mediation by the Team</span><a class="self-link" href="#team-fo-mediation"></a></h4>
@@ -2583,7 +2583,7 @@ <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="5.7" id="ACReview"><span class="secno">5
 	on <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#charter" id="ref-for-charter②">charters</a>, <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#technical-report" id="ref-for-technical-report③">technical reports</a>,
 	and other matters.</p>
     <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="5.7.1" id="ACReviewStart"><span class="secno">5.7.1. </span><span class="content"> Start of a Review Period</span><a class="self-link" href="#ACReviewStart"></a></h4>
-    <p>Each <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑤">Advisory Committee review</a> period
+    <p>Each <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review④">Advisory Committee review</a> period
 	begins with a Call for Review from the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team⑥⑥">Team</a> to the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee" id="ref-for-advisory-committee①⑥">Advisory Committee</a>.
 	The <dfn class="dfn-paneled" data-dfn-type="dfn" data-noexport id="reviewform">Call for Review</dfn> describes the proposal,
 	raises attention to deadlines,
@@ -2592,7 +2592,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="5.7.1" id="ACReviewStart"><span class="s
 	Each Member organization <em class="rfc2119">may</em> send one review,
 	which <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be returned by its <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-representative" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-representative①④">Advisory Committee representative</a>.</p>
     <p>For clarity,
-	in the context of an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑥">AC Review</a>, <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-Dissent" id="ref-for-def-Dissent②">dissent</a> <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be expressed as a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection②⑤">Formal Objection</a>.</p>
+	in the context of an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑤">AC Review</a>, <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-Dissent" id="ref-for-def-Dissent②">dissent</a> <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be expressed as a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#FormalObjection" id="ref-for-FormalObjection②⑤">Formal Objection</a>.</p>
     <p>The Team <em class="rfc2119">must</em> provide two channels for Advisory Committee review comments:</p>
     <ol>
      <li> an archived <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#Team-only" id="ref-for-Team-only⑦">Team-only</a> channel; 
@@ -2654,7 +2654,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="5.7.2" id="ACReviewAfter"><span class="s
 		However, they cannot be directly integrated between <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsPR" id="ref-for-RecsPR①">PR</a> and <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsW3C" id="ref-for-RecsW3C①">REC</a>,
 		because that would fail to trigger a patent exclusion opportunity. </div>
     <p>This document does not specify
-	time intervals between the end of an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑦">Advisory Committee review</a> period
+	time intervals between the end of an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑥">Advisory Committee review</a> period
 	and the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision⑥">W3C decision</a>.
 	This is to ensure that the Members and <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team⑥⑧">Team</a> have sufficient time to consider comments
 	gathered during the review.
@@ -2670,14 +2670,14 @@ <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="5.8" id="ACVotes"><span class="secno">5.
     <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="5.9" id="ACAppeal"><span class="secno">5.9. </span><span class="content"> Appeal by Advisory Committee Representatives</span><a class="self-link" href="#ACAppeal"></a></h3>
     <p><a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-representative" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-representative①⑤">Advisory Committee representatives</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> appeal certain decisions,
 	though appeals are only expected to occur in extraordinary circumstances.</p>
-    <p>When a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision⑦">W3C decision</a> is made following an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑧">Advisory Committee review</a>, <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-representative" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-representative①⑥">Advisory Committee representatives</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> initiate
+    <p>When a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision⑦">W3C decision</a> is made following an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑦">Advisory Committee review</a>, <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-representative" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-representative①⑥">Advisory Committee representatives</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> initiate
 	an <dfn class="dfn-paneled" data-dfn-type="dfn" data-export data-lt="Advisory Committee Appeal|AC Appeal| Appeal" id="advisory-committee-appeal">Advisory Committee Appeal</dfn>.
 	These <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision⑧">W3C decisions</a> include those related to group creation and modification,
 	and transitions to new maturity stages for Recommendation Track documents
 	and the Process document.</p>
     <p><a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-representative" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-representative①⑦">Advisory Committee representatives</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> also initiate an appeal
 	for decisions of a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#w3c-council" id="ref-for-w3c-council②⑧">W3C Council</a>, and
-	for certain decisions that do not involve an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑨">Advisory Committee review</a>.
+	for certain decisions that do not involve an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑧">Advisory Committee review</a>.
 	These cases are identified in the sections
 	which describe the requirements for the decision
 	and include
@@ -3431,7 +3431,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.3" id="transition-reqs"><span class=
 	to verify that the requirements have been met.</p>
     <p><a data-link-type="dfn" href="#trans-req" id="ref-for-trans-req②">Transition Requests</a> to <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#fpwd" id="ref-for-fpwd③">First Public Working Draft</a> or <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsCR" id="ref-for-RecsCR①④">Candidate Recommendation</a> will not normally be approved
 	while a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#GroupsWG" id="ref-for-GroupsWG④①">Working Group</a>'s <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#charter" id="ref-for-charter④">charter</a> is undergoing or awaiting a decision
-	on an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⓪">Advisory Committee Review</a>.</p>
+	on an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review⑨">Advisory Committee Review</a>.</p>
     <p></p>
     <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.4" id="update-reqs"><span class="secno">6.3.4. </span><span class="content"> Updating Mature Publications on the Recommendation Track</span><a class="self-link" href="#update-reqs"></a></h4>
     <p>Certain requests to re-publish a specification
@@ -3680,7 +3680,7 @@ <h5 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.8.2" id="publishing-crud"><span clas
     <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.9" id="transition-pr"><span class="secno">6.3.9. </span><span class="content"> Transitioning to Proposed Recommendation</span><span id="rec-pr"></span><a class="self-link" href="#transition-pr"></a></h4>
     <p>In addition to meeting the <a href="#transition-reqs">requirements for advancement</a>,</p>
     <ul>
-     <li> The status information <em class="rfc2119">must</em> specify the deadline for <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①①">Advisory Committee review</a>,
+     <li> The status information <em class="rfc2119">must</em> specify the deadline for <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⓪">Advisory Committee review</a>,
 			which <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be <strong>at least</strong> 28 days
 			after the publication of the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsPR" id="ref-for-RecsPR⑦">Proposed Recommendation</a> and <em class="rfc2119">should</em> be at least 10 days
 			after the end of the last Exclusion Opportunity
@@ -3704,7 +3704,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.9" id="transition-pr"><span class="s
     <p>The <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team⑨⓪">Team</a>:</p>
     <ul>
      <li> <em class="rfc2119">must</em> announce the publication of a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsPR" id="ref-for-RecsPR⑧">Proposed Recommendation</a> to the <a href="#AC">Advisory Committee</a>,
-			and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> begin an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①②">Advisory Committee Review</a> on the question of whether the specification is appropriate to <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#publishing" id="ref-for-publishing⑨">publish</a> as a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsW3C" id="ref-for-RecsW3C②⑤">W3C Recommendation</a>. 
+			and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> begin an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①①">Advisory Committee Review</a> on the question of whether the specification is appropriate to <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#publishing" id="ref-for-publishing⑨">publish</a> as a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsW3C" id="ref-for-RecsW3C②⑤">W3C Recommendation</a>. 
      <li> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> approve a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsPR" id="ref-for-RecsPR⑨">Proposed Recommendation</a> with minimal <a href="#implementation-experience">implementation experience</a> where there is a compelling reason to do so.
 			In such a case, the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team⑨①">Team</a> <em class="rfc2119">must</em> explain the reasons for that decision,
 			and that information <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be included in the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#reviewform" id="ref-for-reviewform①">Call for Review</a> proposing advancement to <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsW3C" id="ref-for-RecsW3C②⑥">W3C Recommendation</a>. 
@@ -3800,7 +3800,7 @@ <h5 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.11.4" id="revised-rec-features"><spa
 	W3C <em class="rfc2119">must</em> create a new <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#technical-report" id="ref-for-technical-report①⑨">technical report</a>,
 	following the full process of <a href="#rec-advance">advancing a technical report to Recommendation</a> beginning with a new <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#fpwd" id="ref-for-fpwd⑥">First Public Working Draft</a>.</p>
     <h5 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.11.5" id="change-review"><span class="secno">6.3.11.5. </span><span class="content"> Incorporating Candidate Amendments</span><a class="self-link" href="#change-review"></a></h5>
-    <p>A <dfn class="dfn-paneled" data-dfn-type="dfn" data-noexport id="last-call-review">Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments</dfn> verifies acceptance by the W3C community of <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#candidate-amendment" id="ref-for-candidate-amendment⑤">candidate amendments</a> by combining an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①③">AC Review</a> with a patent exclusion opportunity.</p>
+    <p>A <dfn class="dfn-paneled" data-dfn-type="dfn" data-noexport id="last-call-review">Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments</dfn> verifies acceptance by the W3C community of <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#candidate-amendment" id="ref-for-candidate-amendment⑤">candidate amendments</a> by combining an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①②">AC Review</a> with a patent exclusion opportunity.</p>
     <p>The <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-review" id="ref-for-last-call-review①">Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments</a> must be announced to other W3C groups, the public, and the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee" id="ref-for-advisory-committee③⑥">Advisory Committee</a>.
 	The announcement <em class="rfc2119">must</em>:</p>
     <ul>
@@ -3813,7 +3813,7 @@ <h5 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.11.5" id="change-review"><span class
      <li> Solicit review and, if it does not already have it, implementation experience. 
     </ul>
     <p>The combination of the existing <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsW3C" id="ref-for-RecsW3C⑤②">Recommendation</a> with the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#proposed-amendments" id="ref-for-proposed-amendments">proposed amendments</a> included in the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-review" id="ref-for-last-call-review②">Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments</a> is considered a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#patent-review-drafts" id="ref-for-patent-review-drafts②">Patent Review Draft</a> for the purposes of the Patent Policy <a data-link-type="biblio" href="#biblio-patent-policy" title="The W3C Patent Policy">[PATENT-POLICY]</a>.
-	Also, the review initiated by the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-review" id="ref-for-last-call-review③">Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments</a> is an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①④">Advisory Committee Review</a>.</p>
+	Also, the review initiated by the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-review" id="ref-for-last-call-review③">Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments</a> is an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①③">Advisory Committee Review</a>.</p>
     <p class="note" role="note"><span class="marker">Note:</span> <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-for-review-of-proposed-additions" id="ref-for-last-call-for-review-of-proposed-additions①">Last Call for Review of Proposed Additions</a> and <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-for-review-of-proposed-corrections-and-additions" id="ref-for-last-call-for-review-of-proposed-corrections-and-additions">Last Call for Review of Proposed Corrections and Additions</a> can only be issued for <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsW3C" id="ref-for-RecsW3C⑤③">Recommendations</a> that <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#allow-new-features" id="ref-for-allow-new-features③">allow new features</a>.</p>
     <p>A <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#GroupsWG" id="ref-for-GroupsWG⑥⑦">Working Group</a> <em class="rfc2119">may</em> batch
 	multiple <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#proposed-amendments" id="ref-for-proposed-amendments①">proposed amendments</a> into a single <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-review" id="ref-for-last-call-review④">Last Call for Review of Proposed Amendments</a>.
@@ -3854,7 +3854,7 @@ <h5 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.13.1" id="abandon-draft"><span class
 	This can happen if
 	the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#GroupsWG" id="ref-for-GroupsWG⑦③">Working Group</a> decided
 	to abandon work on the report,
-	or as the result of an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑤">AC Review</a> requiring the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#GroupsWG" id="ref-for-GroupsWG⑦④">Working Group</a> to discontinue work on the technical report before completion.
+	or as the result of an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①④">AC Review</a> requiring the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#GroupsWG" id="ref-for-GroupsWG⑦④">Working Group</a> to discontinue work on the technical report before completion.
 	If a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#GroupsWG" id="ref-for-GroupsWG⑦⑤">Working Group</a> is made to <a href="#GeneralTermination">close</a>,
 	W3C <em class="rfc2119">must</em> re-<a data-link-type="dfn" href="#publishing" id="ref-for-publishing①①">publish</a> any unfinished <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#technical-report" id="ref-for-technical-report②③">technical report</a> on the Recommendation track as <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#discontinuedREC" id="ref-for-discontinuedREC①">Discontinued Draft</a>.</p>
     <p>Such a document should include in its status section
@@ -3983,7 +3983,7 @@ <h5 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.13.4" id="deactivation"><span class=
     </ul>
     <p id="proposed-rescinded-rec">The <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team⑨⑨">Team</a> <em class="rfc2119">must</em> then
 	submit the request to the <a href="#AC">Advisory Committee</a> for review.
-	For any <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑥">Advisory Committee review</a> of a proposal to
+	For any <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑤">Advisory Committee review</a> of a proposal to
 	rescind,
 	obsolete,
 	supersede,
@@ -4012,7 +4012,7 @@ <h5 class="heading settled" data-level="6.3.13.4" id="deactivation"><span class=
     <ul>
      <li> identify known implementations. 
     </ul>
-    <p>If there was any <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-Dissent" id="ref-for-def-Dissent⑤">dissent</a> in the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑦">Advisory Committee review</a>,
+    <p>If there was any <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-Dissent" id="ref-for-def-Dissent⑤">dissent</a> in the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑥">Advisory Committee review</a>,
 	the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team①⓪①">Team</a> <em class="rfc2119">must</em> publish
 	the substantive content of the dissent to W3C <strong>and the public</strong>,
 	and <em class="rfc2119">must</em> <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#formally-addressed" id="ref-for-formally-addressed⑦">formally address</a> the dissent
@@ -4099,7 +4099,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.4.4" id="revising-memo"><span class="s
 	including review by the community to ensure
 	the substantive and editorial soundness of the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#candidate-amendment" id="ref-for-candidate-amendment⑨">candidate amendments</a>.
 	To validate this, the group must request
-	an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑧">Advisory Committee review</a> of the changes it wishes to incorporate.
+	an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑦">Advisory Committee review</a> of the changes it wishes to incorporate.
 	The specific <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#candidate-amendment" id="ref-for-candidate-amendment①⓪">candidate amendments</a> under review <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be identified as <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#proposed-amendments" id="ref-for-proposed-amendments①⓪">proposed amendments</a> just as in a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#last-call-for-review-of-proposed-corrections" id="ref-for-last-call-for-review-of-proposed-corrections①">Last Call for Review of Proposed Corrections</a>.</p>
     <p>The decision to incorporate <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#proposed-amendments" id="ref-for-proposed-amendments①①">proposed amendments</a> into <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#statement" id="ref-for-statement①①">W3C Statement</a> is a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision①③">W3C Decision</a>. <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-representative" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-representative②③">Advisory Committee representatives</a> may initiate an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-appeal" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal⑨">Advisory Committee Appeal</a> of the decision.</p>
     <h3 class="heading settled" data-level="6.5" id="registries"><span class="secno">6.5. </span><span class="content"> The Registry Track</span><a class="self-link" href="#registries"></a></h3>
@@ -4178,7 +4178,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.5.1" id="reg-def"><span class="secno">
 			unresponsive,
 			the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team①⓪⑦">Team</a> <em class="rfc2119">should</em> propose replacing the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#custodian" id="ref-for-custodian④">custodian</a>,
 			which <em class="rfc2119">must</em> be confirmed
-			by an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑨">AC Review</a> as a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision①④">W3C Decision</a>.</p>
+			by an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑧">AC Review</a> as a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision①④">W3C Decision</a>.</p>
     </ul>
     <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.5.2" id="reg-pub"><span class="secno">6.5.2. </span><span class="content"> Publishing Registries</span><a class="self-link" href="#reg-pub"></a></h4>
     <p><a data-link-type="dfn" href="#registry" id="ref-for-registry⑥">Registries</a> can be published either
@@ -4234,7 +4234,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.5.2" id="reg-pub"><span class="secno">
      <li> The equivalent of <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsW3C" id="ref-for-RecsW3C⑦②">W3C Recommendation</a> is called <dfn class="dfn-paneled" data-dfn-type="dfn" data-export id="w3c-registry">W3C Registry</dfn>; <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsObs" id="ref-for-RecsObs⑤">Obsolete Recommendation</a> and <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#RecsSup" id="ref-for-RecsSup①">Superseded Recommendation</a> correspond to <dfn data-dfn-type="dfn" data-export id="obsolete-registry">Obsolete Registry<a class="self-link" href="#obsolete-registry"></a></dfn> and <dfn data-dfn-type="dfn" data-export id="superseded-registry">Superseded Registry<a class="self-link" href="#superseded-registry"></a></dfn>. 
      <li> There is no equivalent to the Proposed Recommendation phase.
 			Instead,
-			an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review②⓪">Advisory Committee Review</a> is started
+			an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review①⑨">Advisory Committee Review</a> is started
 			upon publication of each <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#candidate-registry-snapshot" id="ref-for-candidate-registry-snapshot">Candidate Registry Snapshot</a>. 
      <li> Changes that add new features (i.e. <a href="#correction-classes">class 4 changes</a>) are allowed
 			in all <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#w3c-registry" id="ref-for-w3c-registry">W3C Registries</a>,
@@ -4246,7 +4246,7 @@ <h4 class="heading settled" data-level="6.5.3" id="reg-table-update"><span class
 	can be made by re-publishing the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#technical-report" id="ref-for-technical-report②⑧">technical report</a> that contains the affected table,
 	without needing to satisfy any other requirements for the publication
 	(not even Working Group consensus, unless this is required by the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#registry-definition" id="ref-for-registry-definition⑧">registry definition</a>).
-	Such <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#registry-change" id="ref-for-registry-change③">registry changes</a> do not trigger new <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review②①">Advisory Committee Reviews</a>,
+	Such <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#registry-change" id="ref-for-registry-change③">registry changes</a> do not trigger new <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review②⓪">Advisory Committee Reviews</a>,
 	nor Exclusion Opportunities,
 	and do not require verification via an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#update-requests" id="ref-for-update-requests①⓪">update request</a>,
 	even for <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#technical-report" id="ref-for-technical-report②⑨">technical reports</a> at maturities where this would normally be expected.
@@ -4721,7 +4721,7 @@ <h2 class="heading settled" data-level="11" id="GAProcess"><span class="secno">1
     <ol>
      <li> The <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#team" id="ref-for-team①③③">Team</a> sends a Call for Review to the <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee" id="ref-for-advisory-committee④②">Advisory Committee</a> and other W3C groups. 
      <li> After comments have been <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#formally-addressed" id="ref-for-formally-addressed⑨">formally addressed</a> and the document possibly modified,
-			the Team seeks endorsement from the Members by initiating an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review②②">Advisory Committee review</a>.
+			the Team seeks endorsement from the Members by initiating an <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#advisory-committee-review" id="ref-for-advisory-committee-review②①">Advisory Committee review</a>.
 			The review period <em class="rfc2119">must</em> last at least <span class="time-interval">28 days</span>. 
      <li> <a href="#ACReviewAfter">After the Advisory Committee review</a>,
 			following a <a data-link-type="dfn" href="#def-w3c-decision" id="ref-for-def-w3c-decision①⑤">W3C decision</a> to adopt the document(s),
@@ -5587,7 +5587,7 @@ <h3 class="no-num no-ref heading settled" id="informative"><span class="content"
 window.dfnpanelData['fully-addressed'] = {"dfnID": "fully-addressed", "url": "#fully-addressed", "dfnText": "fully addressed", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-fully-addressed"}], "title": "6.3.3. \nAdvancement on the Recommendation Track"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-fully-addressed\u2460"}], "title": "6.3.4. \nUpdating Mature Publications on the Recommendation Track"}], "external": false};
 window.dfnpanelData['minority-opinion'] = {"dfnID": "minority-opinion", "url": "#minority-opinion", "dfnText": "Minority Opinion", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-minority-opinion"}], "title": "5.6.2.7. \nCouncil Decision Report"}], "external": false};
 window.dfnpanelData['council-report'] = {"dfnID": "council-report", "url": "#council-report", "dfnText": "Council Report", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-council-report"}, {"id": "ref-for-council-report\u2460"}, {"id": "ref-for-council-report\u2461"}], "title": "5.6.2.7. \nCouncil Decision Report"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-council-report\u2462"}], "title": "5.6.2.8. \nAppealing Council Decisions"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-council-report\u2463"}], "title": "10.4. \nRejection of a Submission Request, and Submission Appeals"}], "external": false};
-window.dfnpanelData['advisory-committee-review'] = {"dfnID": "advisory-committee-review", "url": "#advisory-committee-review", "dfnText": " Advisory Committee review", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review"}], "title": "4.3. \nAdvisory Committee Review of a Charter"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460"}], "title": "4.6. \nChartered Group Closure"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2461"}], "title": "5.1. \nTypes of Decisions"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2462"}], "title": "5.2.1. \nConsensus"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2463"}], "title": "5.5. \nRegistering Formal Objections"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2464"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2465"}], "title": "5.7.1. \nStart of a Review Period"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2466"}], "title": "5.7.2. \nAfter the Review Period"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2467"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2468"}], "title": "5.9. \nAppeal by Advisory Committee Representatives"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u24ea"}], "title": "6.3.3. \nAdvancement on the Recommendation Track"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2460"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2461"}], "title": "6.3.9. \nTransitioning to Proposed Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2462"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2463"}], "title": "6.3.11.5. \nIncorporating Candidate Amendments"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2464"}], "title": "6.3.13.1. \nAbandoning an Unfinished Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2465"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2466"}], "title": "6.3.13.4. \nProcess for Rescinding, Obsoleting, Superseding, Restoring a Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2467"}], "title": "6.4.4. \nRevising W3C Statements"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2468"}], "title": "6.5.1. \nRegistry Definitions"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2461\u24ea"}], "title": "6.5.2. \nPublishing Registries"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2461\u2460"}], "title": "6.5.3. \nUpdating Registry Tables"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2461\u2461"}], "title": "11. \nProcess Evolution"}], "external": false};
+window.dfnpanelData['advisory-committee-review'] = {"dfnID": "advisory-committee-review", "url": "#advisory-committee-review", "dfnText": " Advisory Committee review", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review"}], "title": "4.3. \nAdvisory Committee Review of a Charter"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460"}], "title": "4.6. \nChartered Group Closure"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2461"}], "title": "5.2.1. \nConsensus"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2462"}], "title": "5.5. \nRegistering Formal Objections"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2463"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2464"}], "title": "5.7.1. \nStart of a Review Period"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2465"}], "title": "5.7.2. \nAfter the Review Period"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2466"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2467"}], "title": "5.9. \nAppeal by Advisory Committee Representatives"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2468"}], "title": "6.3.3. \nAdvancement on the Recommendation Track"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u24ea"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2460"}], "title": "6.3.9. \nTransitioning to Proposed Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2461"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2462"}], "title": "6.3.11.5. \nIncorporating Candidate Amendments"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2463"}], "title": "6.3.13.1. \nAbandoning an Unfinished Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2464"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2465"}], "title": "6.3.13.4. \nProcess for Rescinding, Obsoleting, Superseding, Restoring a Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2466"}], "title": "6.4.4. \nRevising W3C Statements"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2467"}], "title": "6.5.1. \nRegistry Definitions"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2460\u2468"}], "title": "6.5.2. \nPublishing Registries"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2461\u24ea"}], "title": "6.5.3. \nUpdating Registry Tables"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-review\u2461\u2460"}], "title": "11. \nProcess Evolution"}], "external": false};
 window.dfnpanelData['reviewform'] = {"dfnID": "reviewform", "url": "#reviewform", "dfnText": "Call for Review", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-reviewform"}], "title": "5.7.1. \nStart of a Review Period"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-reviewform\u2460"}], "title": "6.3.9. \nTransitioning to Proposed Recommendation"}], "external": false};
 window.dfnpanelData['advisory-committee-appeal'] = {"dfnID": "advisory-committee-appeal", "url": "#advisory-committee-appeal", "dfnText": "Advisory Committee Appeal", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal"}], "title": "5.6.2.7. \nCouncil Decision Report"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2460"}], "title": "5.6.2.8. \nAppealing Council Decisions"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2461"}], "title": "5.8. \nAdvisory Committee Votes"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2462"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2463"}], "title": "5.9. \nAppeal by Advisory Committee Representatives"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2464"}], "title": "6.3.9. \nTransitioning to Proposed Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2465"}], "title": "6.3.10. \nTransitioning to W3C Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2466"}], "title": "6.3.13.4. \nProcess for Rescinding, Obsoleting, Superseding, Restoring a Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2467"}], "title": "6.4.3. \nElevating Group Notes to W3C Statement status"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2468"}], "title": "6.4.4. \nRevising W3C Statements"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2460\u24ea"}, {"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2460\u2460"}], "title": "9. \nLiaisons"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2460\u2461"}], "title": "10.4. \nRejection of a Submission Request, and Submission Appeals"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-advisory-committee-appeal\u2460\u2462"}], "title": "11. \nProcess Evolution"}], "external": false};
 window.dfnpanelData['publishing'] = {"dfnID": "publishing", "url": "#publishing", "dfnText": "Publishing", "refSections": [{"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing"}], "title": "6.1. \nTypes of Technical Reports"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2460"}], "title": "6.2.1. \nPublication of Technical Reports"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2461"}], "title": "6.2.2. \nReviews and Review Responsibilities"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2462"}], "title": "6.2.5. \nCandidate Amendments"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2463"}, {"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2464"}, {"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2465"}], "title": "6.3.1. \nMaturity Stages on the Recommendation Track"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2466"}], "title": "6.3.6. \nRevising a Working Draft"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2467"}], "title": "6.3.8.2. \nPublishing a Candidate Recommendation Draft"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2468"}], "title": "6.3.9. \nTransitioning to Proposed Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2460\u24ea"}, {"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2460\u2460"}, {"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2460\u2461"}], "title": "6.3.13.1. \nAbandoning an Unfinished Recommendation"}, {"refs": [{"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2460\u2462"}, {"id": "ref-for-publishing\u2460\u2463"}], "title": "6.4.1. \nGroup Notes"}], "external": false};