Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[wg/sdw] Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Charter #474

Open
1 of 4 tasks
bert-github opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 14 comments
Open
1 of 4 tasks

[wg/sdw] Spatial Data on the Web Working Group Charter #474

bert-github opened this issue Jul 22, 2024 · 14 comments

Comments

@bert-github
Copy link

bert-github commented Jul 22, 2024

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

Charter Review

Proposed SDW WG charter

diff from charter template

Diff from previous charter

chair dashboard

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

  • New
  • New WG
  • New IG
  • If this is a new WG or IG charter request, link to Advance Notice, and any issue discussion:
  • Existing
  • Existing WG recharter
  • Existing IG recharter
  • If this is a charter extension or revision, any issue discussion:

Horizontal Reviews: apply the Github label "Horizontal review requested" to request reviews for accessibility (a11y), internationalization (i18n), privacy, security, and TAG. Also add a "card" for this issue to the Strategy Funnel.

Communities suggested for outreach:

Known or potential areas of concern:

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised? (this strategy funnel issue, a different github repo, email, ...): w3c/charter-drafts

Anything else we should think about as we review?

Note: proposed chairs should be copied @... on this issue: @ldesousa, @rob-metalinkage

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

Overall the charter looks good.

I was unsure what this sentence was intended to mean:

The following existing specifications are potentially in scope for maintenance:

  1. Each specification might be in scope or it might not
  2. Each specification is in scope, and if it needs maintenance then it may be maintained

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

In particular, it lacks a "motivation and background" section

I see that it does now have that section.

@ruoxiran
Copy link

APA would like to be listed in the liaison groups. so we want to hear about work in the early stages, is that, whilst you are developing low-level APIs, there may be semantic metadata that have an impact on accessibility – either things we’d like you to include to promote accessibility, or accessibility risks relating to things you are proposing to include.

@himorin
Copy link

himorin commented Sep 12, 2024

no comment or request from i18n

@plehegar plehegar added the Advance Notice Sent Advance Notice of (re)chartering has been sent to the AC label Sep 12, 2024
@plehegar
Copy link
Member

Advance notice

@plehegar
Copy link
Member

No comment from PING

@plehegar
Copy link
Member

Some copy-editing improvements:

  • the only sentence in the 3 paragraph Motivation and Background section thats doing any work / needed is “The overarching goal of the SDWWG is to enable spatial data to be integrated within the wider Web of data; developing and maintaining standard patterns and specifications addressing these problems.” (not a normative concern, of course)
  • Again, there are abbreviations and references to other specs and technologies all over this charter that are not clear to the reader. I have no idea what a “SSN Ontology” or “SOSA vocabulary” vocabulary are when they’re described in the Scope section. Just some links and things would help!

@simoneonofri
Copy link

No comments from Security

@ruoxiran
Copy link

ruoxiran commented Oct 9, 2024

no comments from APA.

@svgeesus
Copy link
Contributor

You could delete

Note:Display this table and update it when appropriate. Requirements for charter extension history are documented in the Charter Guidebook (section 4).

@bert-github
Copy link
Author

Deleted.

@siusin
Copy link

siusin commented Oct 28, 2024

The spec name in the 4th bullet of the Scope Sec. is missing.

@bert-github
Copy link
Author

Fixed.

@plehegar
Copy link
Member

@plehegar plehegar added the Data label Nov 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants