-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"Authentic Web" Workshop #483
Comments
@torgo and I have been trying to advance the relationship between C2PA and the W3C, so anything that either/both of us can do to make this happen - and more important have it continue into actual reviews and technical work - let us know! |
see also:
|
See also https://misinfocon.com/about - articles and proposals for tooling to prevent spread of misinformation. Authors include current and former chairs of CredWeb Scott Yates and Connie Moon Sehat |
|
cc @chrisn |
This discussion is needed, and I see the importance of focusing it a bit as we could potentially talk for ages about an infinite number of things. This topic is very important to the digital publishing industry, and I think finding a solution or examining the use cases in that industry would be helpful to the workshop. Anti-counterfeiting of content for example. |
Originator Profile and C2PA (Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity) specifications provide distinct mechanisms to annotate Web content with provenance information, with a common goal of helping users assess the authenticity of digital materials they are finding. Both intends to be applicable to varying degrees to Web browsing.
Both were presented and discussed during TPAC 2024 breakouts:
From these discussions, it seems likely that a W3C Workshop on the topic might help identify common goals, realistic Web platform primitives and integration points that would help have a material impact on the challenges end-users are facing with regard to mis- and dis-information on the Web. The Technological Approaches to Improving Credibility Assessment on the Web report produced by the Credible Web Community Group likely provides a useful structure to have such a conversation.
With that said, it is also clear from the breakout discussions that more work is needed in focusing the topics on which W3C is the most likely to serve as an impactful convener.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: