You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Any link that fails 2.4.4 pretty much by definition fails 2.4.9.
We do agree that reporting a failure of 2.4.9 should not be required, since not every test tool/method reports AAA success criteria. This work for this is happening in this PR: w3c/wcag-act#531
also mentioned was adding the level to the implementation report Expected column, such as
4.1.2 Name Role Value (Level A)
2.4.9 Link Purpose (Link Only (Level AAA)
Is that acepted and will be another PR?
and will PR: w3c/wcag-act#531 remove the Level AAA from the Report when not supported by the tool?
What 531 will do is make it so not all accessibility requirements have to be reported on by a test tool / method. So tools that report AAA can fail it, but tools that don't aren't required to.
When tools report implementations, reporting against AAA criteria should not be required by tools that don't support AAA criteria.
For example,
ACT rule: Link has non-empty accessible name
RuleID c487ae
https://wai-wcag-act-rules.netlify.app/standards-guidelines/act/rules/c487ae/
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: