You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am running the model following the instruction on the test set and a personal dataset and find out that the FN rate is very high and while the precision rate is close to what is being reported in the paper, the recall rate is not nearly the same (10% and 40% for residential and commercial areas respectively).
Anyone know what the issue is?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Billy, have you solved your low recall rate problem? I'm facing the same issue in a personal dataset in Portugal with a 28% recall for a residential area.
@billlyzhaoyh Thanks for the feedback. I do agree with you. We've tried in another PT area (https://goo.gl/maps/buQxMkEgC2hNDDAKA) with around 10.5k tiles and we got a Precision of 90% and Recall of 36%.
Perhaps we really have to train the model with our own images...
I am running the model following the instruction on the test set and a personal dataset and find out that the FN rate is very high and while the precision rate is close to what is being reported in the paper, the recall rate is not nearly the same (10% and 40% for residential and commercial areas respectively).
Anyone know what the issue is?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: