-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
missleaging light sectors #13
Comments
Thanks for bringing this up. |
I use QGIS for the styling and rendering. You can design it interactively and then run it in server mode and let MapProxy seed pull the tiles into the cache. The instructions for the style are in https://github.com/quantenschaum/mapping/blob/master/bsh.qgs
|
For my taste, the sector radii are generally too small compared to a classic (paper) chart to be able to read the sectors accurately. I made the fog light arc dashed and added "(fog)" to the label to indicate, that it is exhibited during fog only. |
I agree on the size. Most probably I will add an option to scale the arcs and sectors independently from the symbol scale (currently they scale with the symbols). |
Nice. I made the radius proportional to the range of light and the map scale and clamped it to fixed limits. Fog lights get a factor of 0.7. Arcs with a radius below a threshold (20) are not shown at all. from QGIS
|
I stumbled upon the following: The light Travemünde, N-Mole is shown on the map to have a white sector to NE, but this white sector is actually a fog light. In normal operation this light has one red and one green sector. IMHO this is misleading and potentially very dangerous.
compare to http://waddenzee.duckdns.org/#17/53.96171/10.88879
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: